|
|
||||||||
HEALTH POLICY AND ETHICS |
Rosanne P. Farris and Julie C. Will are with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Atlanta, Ga. Olga Khavjou and Eric A. Finkelstein are with RTI International, Health, Social, and Economics Research, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Rosanne P. Farris, PhD, Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, MS K-47 Atlanta, GA 30341 (e-mail: rif6{at}cdc.gov).
Interventions that are effective are often improperly or only partially implemented when put into practice. When intervention programs are evaluated, feasibility of implementation and effectiveness need to be examined. Reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance make up the RE-AIM framework used to assess such programs. To examine the usefulness of this metric, we addressed 2 key research questions. Is it feasible to operationalize the RE-AIM framework using womens health program data? How does the determination of a successful program differ if the criterion is (1) effectiveness alone, (2) reach and effectiveness, or (3) the 5 dimensions of the RE-AIM framework? Findings indicate that it is feasible to operationalize the RE-AIM concepts and that RE-AIM may provide a richer measure of contextual factors for program success compared with other evaluation approaches.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Terre Health Risk Reduction in Women American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, June 1, 2008; 2(3): 227 - 229. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |