|
|
||||||||
DEALING WITH INNOVATION AND UNCERTAINTY |
Andrew L. Dannenberg is with the National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga. Rajiv Bhatia is with the San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, Calif. Brian L. Cole is with the University of California, Los Angeles School of Public Health. Carlos Dora is with the World Health Organization Health Impact Assessment Programme, Geneva, Switzerland. Jonathan E. Fielding is with the University of California, Los Angeles School of Public Health and the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services. At the time of the study, Katherine Kraft was with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ. Diane McClymont-Peace is with Health Canada, Ottawa, Canada. At the time of the study, Jennifer Mindell was with the London Health Observatory, London, England. Chinwe Onyekere is with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton. James A. Roberts is an environmental impact assessment consultant, Sacramento, Calif. Catherine L. Ross is with the Georgia Institute of Technology College of Architecture, Atlanta, Ga. Candace D. Rutt is with the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. Alex Scott-Samuel is with the Liverpool Public Health Observatory, University of Liverpool, England. Hugh H. Tilson is with the University of North Carolina School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Andrew L. Dannenberg, National Center for Environmental Health, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, Mail Stop F-30, Atlanta, GA 30341 (e-mail: acd7{at}cdc.gov).
Health impact assessment (HIA) methods are used to evaluate the impact on health of policies and projects in community design, transportation planning, and other areas outside traditional public health concerns. At an October 2004 workshop, domestic and international experts explored issues associated with advancing the use of HIA methods by local health departments, planning commissions, and other decisionmakers in the United States.
Workshop participants recommended conducting pilot tests of existing HIA tools, developing a database of health impacts of common projects and policies, developing resources for HIA use, building workforce capacity to conduct HIAs, and evaluating HIAs. HIA methods can influence decisionmakers to adjust policies and projects to maximize benefits and minimize harm to the publics health.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Corburn Reconnecting with Our Roots: American Urban Planning and Public Health in the Twenty-first Century Urban Affairs Review, May 1, 2007; 42(5): 688 - 713. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bhatia Protecting Health Using an Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of San Francisco Land Use Decisionmaking Am J Public Health, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 406 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Fielding and P. A. Briss Promoting evidence-based public health policy: can we have better evidence and more action? Health Aff., July 1, 2006; 25(4): 969 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Simon and J. E. Fielding Public health and business: a partnership that makes cents. Health Aff., July 1, 2006; 25(4): 1029 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Greenberg The Diffusion of Public Health Innovations Am J Public Health, February 1, 2006; 96(2): 209 - 210. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |