AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Oct 3, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2005.082172v1
96/11/1914    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malone, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Froelicher, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malone, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Froelicher, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Community Health
Right arrow Ethics
Right arrow Health Policy
Right arrow African Americans/Blacks
Right arrow Socioeconomic Factors
Right arrow Tobacco Control
November 2006, Vol 96, No. 11 | American Journal of Public Health 1914-1919
© 2006 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.082172

HEALTH POLICY AND ETHICS

"It’s Like Tuskegee in Reverse": A Case Study of Ethical Tensions in Institutional Review Board Review of Community-Based Participatory Research

Ruth E. Malone, RN, PhD, FAAN, Valerie B. Yerger, ND, Carol McGruder, BA and Erika Froelicher, RN, PhD, FAAN

Ruth E. Malone and Valerie B. Yerger are with the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco. Carol McGruder is with Polaris Research and Development and the San Francisco African American Tobacco-Free Project, San Francisco. Erika Froelicher is with the Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Ruth Malone, RN, PhD, FAAN, UCSF, Box 0612, San Francisco, CA 94143–0612 (e-mail: ruth.malone{at}ucsf.edu).

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) addresses the social justice dimensions of health disparities by engaging marginalized communities, building capacity for action, and encouraging more egalitarian relationships between researchers and communities. CBPR may challenge institutionalized academic practices and the understandings that inform institutional review board deliberations and, indirectly, prioritize particular kinds of research.

We present our attempt to study, as part of a CBPR partnership, cigarette sales practices in an inner-city community. We use critical and communitarian perspectives to examine the implications of the refusal of the university institutional review board (in this case, the University of California, San Francisco) to approve the study.

CBPR requires expanding ethical discourse beyond the procedural, principle-based approaches common in biomedical research settings. The current ethics culture of academia may sometimes serve to protect institutional power at the expense of community empowerment.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Qualitative Social WorkHome page
M. Leisey
Qualitative Inquiry and the IRB: Protection at all Costs?
Qualitative Social Work, December 1, 2008; 7(4): 415 - 426.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Public Health Association