AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuppin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Carpiano, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuppin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Carpiano, R. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Social Science
Right arrow Genetics
Right arrow Health Professionals
Right arrow Health Promotion
Right arrow Mental Health
Right arrow Alcohol
Right arrow Drugs
October 2006, Vol 96, No. 10 | American Journal of Public Health 1766-1771
© 2006 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.060855

RESEARCH AND PRACTICE

Public Conceptions of Serious Mental Illness and Substance Abuse, Their Causes and Treatments: Findings from the 1996 General Social Survey

Sara Kuppin, DrPH and Richard M. Carpiano, PhD, MA, MPH

At the time of the study, Sara Kuppin was with the Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, and Richard M. Carpiano was with the Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Sara Kuppin, 41 River Terrace, Apt 4106, New York, NY 10282 (e-mail: sak141{at}columbia.edu).

Objectives. We examined the degree to which lay beliefs about the causes of disorders may predict beliefs about what constitutes appropriate treatment.

Methods. We analyzed randomized vignette data from the MacArthur Mental Health Module of the 1996 General Social Survey (n=1010).

Results. Beliefs in biological causes (i.e., chemical imbalance, genes) were significantly associated with the endorsement of professional, biologically focused treatments (e.g., prescription medication, psychiatrists, and mental hospital admissions). Belief that the way a person was raised was the cause of a condition was the only nonbiologically based causal belief associated with any treatment recommendations (talking to a clergy member).

Conclusions. Lay beliefs about the biological versus nonbiological causes of mental and substance abuse disorders are related to beliefs regarding appropriate treatment. We suggest areas for further research with regard to better understanding this relationship in an effort to construct effective messages promoting treatment for mental health and substance abuse disorders.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Schizophr BullHome page
T. M. Lincoln, E. Arens, C. Berger, and W. Rief
Can Antistigma Campaigns Be Improved? A Test of the Impact of Biogenetic Vs Psychosocial Causal Explanations on Implicit and Explicit Attitudes to Schizophrenia
Schizophr Bull, December 1, 2007; (2007) sbm131v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Public Health Association