|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMMENTARY |
Lester Breslow is with the School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Lester Breslow, MD, MPH, UCLA, School of Public Health, 650 Charles E Young Dr S, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (e-mail: breslow{at}ph.ucla.edu).
When writing about "the second epidemiologic revolution," Terris discussed 2 eras in health. The first erathe communicable disease erabegan during ancient times and continues today; the second erathe chronic disease erabegan during the 20th century, particularly among the industrialized nations.
Although neither revolution against these types of diseases is complete, we have made such considerable progress that substantial and growing segments of the population no longer regard disease as the only, or even the primary, health problem. Increasingly, the goal is a long and fruitful life, not simply the absence of disease. That potential and the effort to achieve it compose the third era of health, and a proposed new measure of health is outlined in this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Angel and R. J. Angel Minority Group Status and Healthful Aging: Social Structure Still Matters Am J Public Health, July 1, 2006; 96(7): 1152 - 1159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |