HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: AJPH.2004.053439v1 96/1/167    most recent Submit a response View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Beitsch, L. M. Articles by Menachemi, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Beitsch, L. M. Articles by Menachemi, N. Related Collections Health Administration Public Health Practice Government Surveys

Leslie M. Beitsch, MD, JD, Robert G. Brooks, MD, Meade Grigg, MS and Nir Menachemi, PhD, MPH

Leslie M. Beitsch, Robert G. Brooks, and Nir Menachemi are with the Division of Health Affairs, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee. Meade Grigg is with the Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Data Analysis, Florida Department of Health, Tallahassee.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Leslie M. Beitsch, MD, JD, Division of Health Affairs, Florida State University College of Medicine, 1115 W Call St, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4300 (e-mail: leslie.beitsch{at}med.fsu.edu).

Objectives. We assessed the structure and functions of state health departments throughout the United States and compared our findings with those from a previous national assessment conducted in 1990.

Methods. In 2001, we sent a survey to the state health officers of all 50 states. The survey asked about the structure and functions of the state health agency.

Results. The survey was completed by state health officers from 47 states (a 94% response rate). More than half of the states responding had a freestanding state public health agency and a state board or council of health. Forty-four percent had a regional or district structure. Although some traditional public health functions have been curtailed, important new public health functions have emerged since 1990.

Conclusions. Our current findings confirm core changes in the structure and functions of state public health systems over the past decade and emphasize the need for more research into these systems to maximize their organizational performance.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. M. Meier, J. G. Hodge Jr, and K. M. Gebbie Transitions in State Public Health Law: Comparative Analysis of State Public Health Law Reform Following the Turning Point Model State Public Health Act Am J Public Health, March 1, 2009; 99(3): 423 - 430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C. McBride, Y. M. Terry-McElrath, C. J. VanderWaal, J. F. Chriqui, and J. Myllyluoma US Public Health Agency Involvement in Youth-Focused Illicit Drug Policy, Planning, and Prevention at the Local Level, 1999-2003 Am J Public Health, February 1, 2008; 98(2): 270 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Wang and C. Watts The Role of Genetics in the Provision of Essential Public Health Services Am J Public Health, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 620 - 625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Beitsch, R. G. Brooks, N. Menachemi, and P. M. Libbey Public health at center stage: new roles, old props. Health Aff., July 1, 2006; 25(4): 911 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]