AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print May 11, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2004.040667v1
95/6/969    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ong, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Glantz, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ong, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Glantz, S. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Tobacco Control
Right arrow Environmental Tobacco Smoke
Right arrow Community Health
Right arrow Health Policy
Right arrow Government
Right arrow Smoking Cessation
June 2005, Vol 95, No. 6 | American Journal of Public Health 969-975
© 2005 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.040667


BUILDING CAPACITY AND EVALUATING STRATEGIES

Free Nicotine Replacement Therapy Programs vs Implementing Smoke-Free Workplaces: A Cost-Effectiveness Comparison

Michael K. Ong, MD, PhD and Stanton A. Glantz, PhD

Michael K. Ong is with the VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif, and the Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. Stanton A. Glantz is with the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Stanton A. Glantz, PhD, Professor of Medicine, Ste 366 Library, 530 Parnassus, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143–1390 (e-mail: glantz{at}medicine.ucsf.edu).

We compared the cost-effectiveness of a free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) program with a statewide smoke-free workplace policy in Minnesota. We conducted 1-year simulations of costs and benefits. The number of individuals who quit smoking and the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were the measures of benefits. After 1 year, a NRT program generated 18 500 quitters at a cost of $7020 per quitter ($4440 per QALY), and a smoke-free workplace policy generated 10 400 quitters at a cost of $799 per quitter ($506 per QALY). Smoke-free work-place policies are about 9 times more cost-effective per new nonsmoker than free NRT programs are. Smoke-free workplace policies should be a public health funding priority, even when the primary goal is to promote individual smoking cessation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eval RevHome page
L. Stolzenberg and S. J. D'Alessio
Is Nonsmoking Dangerous to the Health of Restaurants? The Effect of California's Indoor Smoking Ban on Restaurant Revenues
Eval Rev, February 1, 2007; 31(1): 75 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, August 13, 2005; 331(7513): E374 - E374.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, June 4, 2005; 330(7503): 1338 - 1338.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Public Health Association