|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HEALTH POLICY AND ETHICS |
The author is with the Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University Medical School, Palo Alto, Calif.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, PhD, Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, 701 Welch Rd, Bldg A, Suite 1105, Palo Alto, CA 94304 (e-mail: sandra.lee{at}stanford.edu).
Current practices of using "race" in pharmacogenomics research demands consideration of the ethical and social implications for understandings of group difference and for efforts to eliminate health disparities. This discussion focuses on an "infrastructure of racialization" created by current trajectories of research on genetic differences among racially identified groups, the use of race as a proxy for risk in clinical practice, and increasing interest in new market niches by the pharmaceutical industry.
The confluence of these factors has resulted in the conflation of genes, disease, and race. I argue that public investment in pharmacogenomics requires careful consideration of current inequities in health status and social and ethical concerns over reifying race and issues of distributive justice.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. M. Reverby "Special Treatment": BiDil, Tuskegee, and the Logic of Race J. Law Med. Ethics, September 1, 2008; 36(3): 478 - 484. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L M Hunt and M S Megyesi Genes, race and research ethics: who's minding the store? J. Med. Ethics, June 1, 2008; 34(6): 495 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. Rebbeck, C. H. Halbert, and P. Sankar Genetics, Epidemiology, and Cancer Disparities: Is it Black and White? J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2006; 24(14): 2164 - 2169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |