AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Oct 27, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
AJPH.2005.068676v2
95/12/2133    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. S.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. S.-J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ethics
Right arrow Genetics
Right arrow Social Science
Right arrow Other Race/Ethnicity
December 2005, Vol 95, No. 12 | American Journal of Public Health 2133-2138
© 2005 American Public Health Association
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.068676


HEALTH POLICY AND ETHICS

Racializing Drug Design: Implications of Pharmacogenomics for Health Disparities

Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, PhD

The author is with the Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University Medical School, Palo Alto, Calif.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, PhD, Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, 701 Welch Rd, Bldg A, Suite 1105, Palo Alto, CA 94304 (e-mail: sandra.lee{at}stanford.edu).

Current practices of using "race" in pharmacogenomics research demands consideration of the ethical and social implications for understandings of group difference and for efforts to eliminate health disparities. This discussion focuses on an "infrastructure of racialization" created by current trajectories of research on genetic differences among racially identified groups, the use of race as a proxy for risk in clinical practice, and increasing interest in new market niches by the pharmaceutical industry.

The confluence of these factors has resulted in the conflation of genes, disease, and race. I argue that public investment in pharmacogenomics requires careful consideration of current inequities in health status and social and ethical concerns over reifying race and issues of distributive justice.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
S. M. Reverby
"Special Treatment": BiDil, Tuskegee, and the Logic of Race
J. Law Med. Ethics, September 1, 2008; 36(3): 478 - 484.
[PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
L M Hunt and M S Megyesi
Genes, race and research ethics: who's minding the store?
J. Med. Ethics, June 1, 2008; 34(6): 495 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
T. R. Rebbeck, C. H. Halbert, and P. Sankar
Genetics, Epidemiology, and Cancer Disparities: Is it Black and White?
J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2006; 24(14): 2164 - 2169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Public Health Association