HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (39) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brownson, R. C. Articles by Sallis, J. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brownson, R. C. Articles by Sallis, J. F. Related Collections Exercise/Physical Activity Other Environment Rural Health Surveillance Surveys Urban Health

Ross C. Brownson, PhD, Jen Jen Chang, MPH, Amy A. Eyler, PhD, MS, Barbara E. Ainsworth, PhD, MPH, Karen A. Kirtland, PhD, Brian E. Saelens, PhD and James F. Sallis, PhD

Ross C. Brownson, Jen Jen Chang, and Amy A. Eyler are with the Department of Community Health and Prevention Research Center, Saint Louis University School of Public Health, St Louis, Mo. Barbara E. Ainsworth and Karen A. Kirtland are with the Prevention Research Center, University of South Carolina School of Public Health, Columbia. Brian E. Saelens is with the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Psychology, Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. James F. Sallis is with the Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, Calif.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Ross C. Brownson, Dept of Community Health and Prevention Research Center, Saint Louis University School of Public Health, Salus Center Room 469, 3545 Lafayette Ave, St Louis, MO 63104 (e-mail: brownson{at}slu.edu).

Objectives. We tested the reliability of 3 instruments that assessed social and physical environments.

Methods. We conducted a test–retest study among US adults (n = 289). We used telephone survey methods to measure suitableness of the perceived (vs objective) environment for recreational physical activity and nonmotorized transportation.

Results. Most questions in our surveys that attempted to measure specific characteristics of the built environment showed moderate to high reliability. Questions about the social environment showed lower reliability than those that assessed the physical environment. Certain blocks of questions appeared to be selectively more reliable for urban or rural respondents.

Conclusions. Despite differences in content and in response formats, all 3 surveys showed evidence of reliability, and most items are now ready for use in research and in public health surveillance.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. S. Morris, E. McAuley, and R. W. Motl Self-efficacy and environmental correlates of physical activity among older women and women with multiple sclerosis Health Educ. Res., August 1, 2008; 23(4): 744 - 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Deshpande, E. A. Baker, S. L. Lovegreen, and R. C. Brownson Environmental Correlates of Physical Activity Among Individuals With Diabetes in the Rural Midwest Diabetes Care, May 1, 2005; 28(5): 1012 - 1018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]