AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Varnell, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Blitstein, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Varnell, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Blitstein, J. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Statistics/Evaluation/Research
March 2004, Vol 94, No. 3 | American Journal of Public Health 393-399
© 2004 American Public Health Association


EVALUATION METHODS AND PRACTICE

Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials: A Review of Recent Practices

Sherri P. Varnell, PhD, David M. Murray, PhD, Jessica B. Janega, MS and Jonathan L. Blitstein, MS

Sherri P. Varnell is with NorthropGrumman Mission Systems, Atlanta, Ga. David M. Murray, Jessica B. Janega, and Jonathan L. Blitstein are with the Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Memphis, Tenn.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to David M. Murray, PhD, 3693 Norriswood, 202 Psychology Building, Memphis, TN 38134 (e-mail: d.murray{at}mail.psyc.memphis.edu).

We reviewed group-randomized trials (GRTs) published in the American Journal of Public Health and Preventive Medicine from 1998 through 2002 and estimated the proportion of GRTs that employ appropriate methods for design and analysis.

Of 60 articles, 9 (15.0%) reported evidence of using appropriate methods for sample size estimation. Of 59 articles in the analytic review, 27 (45.8%) reported at least 1 inappropriate analysis and 12 (20.3%) reported only inappropriate analyses. Nineteen (32.2%) reported analyses at an individual or subgroup level, ignoring group, or included group as a fixed effect.

Hence increased vigilance is needed to ensure that appropriate methods for GRTs are employed and that results based on inappropriate methods are not published.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
S. Eldridge, D. Ashby, C. Bennett, M. Wakelin, and G. Feder
Internal and external validity of cluster randomised trials: systematic review of recent trials
BMJ, April 19, 2008; 336(7649): 876 - 880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
D. M. Murray, S. L. Pals, J. L. Blitstein, C. M. Alfano, and J. Lehman
Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials in Cancer: A Review of Current Practices
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 2, 2008; 100(7): 483 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
P. Z. Schochet
Statistical Power for Random Assignment Evaluations of Education Programs
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, March 1, 2008; 33(1): 62 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
J. L. Blitstein, P. J. Hannan, D. M. Murray, and W. R. Shadish
Increasing the Degrees of Freedom in Existing Group Randomized Trials: The df* Approach
Eval Rev, June 1, 2005; 29(3): 241 - 267.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
J. L. Blitstein, D. M. Murray, P. J. Hannan, and W. R. Shadish
Increasing the Degrees of Freedom in Future Group Randomized Trials: The df* Approach
Eval Rev, June 1, 2005; 29(3): 268 - 286.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
B. C. Lee, J. D. Westaby, and R. L. Berg
Impact of a National Rural Youth Health and Safety Initiative: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
Am J Public Health, October 1, 2004; 94(10): 1743 - 1749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
S. J. Zyzanski, S. A. Flocke, and L. M. Dickinson
On the Nature and Analysis of Clustered Data
Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2004; 2(3): 199 - 200.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
D. C. Des Jarlais, C. Lyles, N. Crepaz, and the TREND Group
Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement
Am J Public Health, March 1, 2004; 94(3): 361 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
D. M. Murray, S. P. Varnell, and J. L. Blitstein
Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials: A Review of Recent Methodological Developments
Am J Public Health, March 1, 2004; 94(3): 423 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Public Health Association