| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
PROGRESS, SETBACKS, AND FUTURE NEEDS |
At the time of the study, Michael Givel was with the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, and the University of Oklahoma, Norman, Okla. Stanton A. Glantz is with the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, Institute for Health Policy Studies, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Stanton A. Glantz, PhD, Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-1390 (e-mail: glantz{at}medicine.ucsf.edu).
On June 20, 1997 a group of attorneys and health advocates proposed a "global settlement" of all public and private litigation against the tobacco industry. This agreement was controversial, and the subsequent implementing legislation was defeated. We sought to determine whether the global settlement represented a "missed opportunity" or a dead end.
We compared the global settlement with subsequent laws, regulations, settlements, and judgments against the tobacco industry and found that other than Food and Drug Administration regulation of tobacco, tobacco control advocates have achieved many of the policies included in the global settlement and several beyond it.
The policies that have been developed since 1997 have advanced tobacco control substantially, often beyond the provisions of the global settlement.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. S. Magnusson Mapping the Scope and Opportunities for Public Health Law in Liberal Democracies J. Law Med. Ethics, December 1, 2007; 35(4): 571 - 587. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. M Sebrie and S. A Glantz "Accommodating" smoke-free policies: tobacco industry's Courtesy of Choice programme in Latin America Tob. Control, October 1, 2007; 16(5): e6 - e6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. M. Sebrie and S. A. Glantz Attempts to Undermine Tobacco Control: Tobacco Industry "Youth Smoking Prevention" Programs to Undermine Meaningful Tobacco Control in Latin America Am J Public Health, August 1, 2007; 97(8): 1357 - 1367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Givel FDA legislation Tob. Control, August 1, 2007; 16(4): 217 - 218. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Rajkumar, C. P. Gross, and H. P. Forman Is the Tobacco Settlement Constitutional? J. Law Med. Ethics, December 1, 2006; 34(4): 748 - 752. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. T. Studlar Unfiltered: Conflicts over Tobacco Policy and Public Health; Smoke in Their Eyes: Lessons in Movement Leadership from the Tobacco Wars; The Fight Against Big Tobacco: The Movement, the State, and the Public's Health Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, April 1, 2006; 31(2): 395 - 407. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F A Sloan, C A Mathews, and J G Trogdon Impacts of the Master Settlement Agreement on the tobacco industry Tob. Control, December 1, 2004; 13(4): 356 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E K Tong and S A Glantz ARTIST (Asian regional tobacco industry scientist team): Philip Morris' attempt to exert a scientific and regulatory agenda on Asia Tob. Control, December 1, 2004; 13(suppl_2): ii118 - ii124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B C Alamar and S A Glantz The tobacco industry's use of Wall Street analysts in shaping policy Tob. Control, September 1, 2004; 13(3): 223 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L L Mandel and S A Glantz Hedging their bets: tobacco and gambling industries work against smoke-free policies Tob. Control, September 1, 2004; 13(3): 268 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. G. Healton, M. L. Haviland, and E. Vargyas Will the Master Settlement Agreement Achieve a Lasting Legacy? Health Promot Pract, July 1, 2004; 5(3_suppl): 12S - 17S. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
