AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lockwood, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lockwood, A. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ethics
Right arrow Health Policy
Right arrow Nutrition/Food
Right arrow Other Child and Adolescent Health
Right arrow Other Environment
November 2004, Vol 94, No. 11 | American Journal of Public Health 1908-1916
© 2004 American Public Health Association


HEALTH POLICY AND ETHICS

Human Testing of Pesticides: Ethical and Scientific Considerations

Alan H. Lockwood, MD

Alan H. Lockwood is with the Department of Veterans Affairs, Western NY Health-care System and the University at Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Alan H. Lockwood, MD, Center for PET (115P), VA Western NY Healthcare System, 3495 Bailey Ave, Buffalo, NY 14215 (e-mail: ahl{at}buffalo.edu).

I reviewed ethical and scientific aspects of 6 human pesticide-dosing studies submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for consideration during the pesticide reregistration process. All had serious ethical or scientific deficiencies—or both—including unacceptable informed consent procedures, unmanaged financial conflicts of interest, inadequate statistical power, inappropriate test methods and endpoints, and distorted results.

Given today’s knowledge of the effects of pesticides, there is no assurance that any such study can be completely free of short-term risks, long-term risks, or both. Therefore, there is no basis for allowing pesticide studies to continue or for using them during the pesticide reregistration process. An EPA committee that is free from political and financial conflicts of interest should review this practice.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
K Shrader-Frechette
Ideological toxicology: invalid logic, science, ethics about low-dose pollution
Human and Experimental Toxicology, August 1, 2008; 27(8): 647 - 657.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. Krimsky and T. Simoncelli
Testing Pesticides in Humans: Of Mice and Men Divided by Ten
JAMA, June 6, 2007; 297(21): 2405 - 2407.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Public Health Association