HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mainous, A. G. Articles by Pearson, W. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mainous, A. G., III Articles by Pearson, W. S. Related Collections Diabetes Other Chronic Disease Managed Care Quality of Care Other Health Service Delivery

Arch G. Mainous, III, PhD, Richelle J. Koopman, MD, James M. Gill, MD, MPH, Richard Baker, MD and William S. Pearson, MHA

Arch G. Mainous III, Richelle J. Koopman, and William S. Pearson are with the Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. James M. Gill is with the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Christiana Care Health Services, Wilmington, Del. Richard Baker is with the Department of General Practice, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Arch G. Mainous III, PhD, Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, PO Box 250192, 295 Calhoun St, Charleston, SC 29425 (e-mail: mainouag{at}musc.edu).

Objectives. We examined the relationship between continuity of care and diabetes control.

Methods. We analyzed data on 1400 adults with diabetes who took part in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We examined the relationship of continuity of care with glycemic, blood pressure, and lipid control.

Results. Continuity of care was associated with both acceptable and optimal levels of glycemic control. Continuity was not associated with blood pressure or lipid control. There was no difference between having a usual site but no usual provider and having a usual provider in any of the investigated outcomes.

Conclusions. Continuity of care is associated with better glycemic control among people with diabetes. Our results do not support a benefit of having a usual provider above having a usual site of care.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. C Gulliford, S. Naithani, and M. Morgan Continuity of care and intermediate outcomes of type 2 diabetes mellitus Fam. Pract., June 1, 2007; 24(3): 245 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H Alazri, P. Heywood, R. D Neal, and B. Leese UK GPs' and practice nurses' views of continuity of care for patients with type 2 diabetes Fam. Pract., April 1, 2007; 24(2): 128 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Gulliford, S. Naithani, and M. Morgan Measuring Continuity of Care in Diabetes Mellitus: An Experience-Based Measure Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2006; 4(6): 548 - 555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. G Mainous III, V. A Diaz, S. Saxena, R. Baker, C. J Everett, R. J Koopman, and A. Majeed Diabetes management in the USA and England: comparative analysis of national surveys J R Soc Med, September 1, 2006; 99(9): 463 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Konrad, D. L. Howard, L. J. Edwards, A. Ivanova, and T. S. Carey Physician-Patient Racial Concordance, Continuity of Care, and Patterns of Care for Hypertension Am J Public Health, December 1, 2005; 95(12): 2186 - 2190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]