HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bryan-Jones, K. Articles by Bero, L. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bryan-Jones, K. Articles by Bero, L. A. Related Collections Ethics Other Tobacco

Katherine Bryan-Jones and Lisa A. Bero, PhD

Katherine Bryan-Jones and Lisa A. Bero are with the Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Lisa A. Bero, PhD, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Institute for Health Policy Studies, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, Box 1390, San Francisco, CA 94143–1390 (e-mail:bero{at}medicine.ucsf.edu).

Objectives. We describe tobacco industry strategies to defeat the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Indoor Air Quality rule and the implementation of those strategies.

Methods. We analyzed tobacco industry documents, public commentary on, and media coverage of the OSHA rule.

Results. The tobacco industry had 5 strategies: (1) maintain scientific debate about the basis of the rule, (2) delay deliberation on the rule, (3) redefine the scope of the rule, (4) recruit and assist labor and business organizations in opposing the rule, and (5) increase media coverage of the tobacco industry position. The tobacco industry successfully implemented all 5 strategies.

Conclusions. Our findings suggest that regulatory authorities must take into account the source, motivation, and validity of arguments used in the regulatory process in order to make accurately informed decisions.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. K. Tong and S. A. Glantz Tobacco Industry Efforts Undermining Evidence Linking Secondhand Smoke With Cardiovascular Disease Circulation, October 16, 2007; 116(16): 1845 - 1854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Lopipero and L. A Bero Tobacco interests or the public interest: 20 years of industry strategies to undermine airline smoking restrictions. Tob. Control, August 1, 2006; 15(4): 323 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E D Balbach and E M Barbeau Beyond quagmires: the evolving quality of documents research Tob. Control, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 361 - 362. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S M Carter Tobacco document research reporting Tob. Control, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 368 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E M Barbeau, G Kelder, S Ahmed, V Mantuefel, and E D Balbach From strange bedfellows to natural allies: the shifting allegiance of fire service organisations in the push for federal fire-safe cigarette legislation Tob. Control, October 1, 2005; 14(5): 338 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Cook, E. K. Tong, S. A. Glantz, and L. A. Bero The Power Of Paperwork: How Philip Morris Neutralized The Medical Code For Secondhand Smoke Health Aff., July 1, 2005; 24(4): 994 - 1004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L L Mandel and S A Glantz Hedging their bets: tobacco and gambling industries work against smoke-free policies Tob. Control, September 1, 2004; 13(3): 268 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J Drope, S A Bialous, and S A Glantz Tobacco industry efforts to present ventilation as an alternative to smoke-free environments in North America Tob. Control, March 1, 2004; 13(90001): i41 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Schroeder Tobacco Control in the Wake of the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement N. Engl. J. Med., January 15, 2004; 350(3): 293 - 301. [Full Text] [PDF]