AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Navarro, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Navarro, V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Social Science
Right arrow Health Policy
Right arrow Access to Care
Right arrow Government
January 2003, Vol 93, No. 1 | American Journal of Public Health 64-67
© 2003 American Public Health Association


HEALTH POLICY AND ETHICS FORUM

Policy Without Politics: The Limits of Social Engineering

Vicente Navarro, MD, DrPH, PhD

The author is with the Department of Health and Public Policy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Vicente Navarro, MD, DrPH, PhD, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Hampton House, Room 448, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205 (e-mail: vnavarro{at}jhsph.edu).

The extent of coverage provided by a country’s health services is directly related to the level of development of that country’s democratic process (and its power relations).

The United States is the only developed country whose government does not guarantee access to health care for its citizens. It is also the developed country with the least representative and most insufficient democratic institutions, owing to the constitutional framework of the political system, the privatization of the electoral process, and the enormous power of corporate interests in both the media and the political process.

As international experience shows, without a strong labor-based movement willing to be radical in its protests, a universal health care program will never be accepted by the US establishment.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
A. E. Yamin
The Right to Health Under International Law and Its Relevance to the United States
Am J Public Health, July 1, 2005; 95(7): 1156 - 1161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Public Health Association