AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Himmelstein, D. U.
Right arrow Articles by Woolhandler, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Himmelstein, D. U.
Right arrow Articles by Woolhandler, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Insurance
Right arrow Managed Care
Right arrow Health Policy
Right arrow Public Health Workers
January 2003, Vol 93, No. 1 | American Journal of Public Health 102-105
© 2003 American Public Health Association


REKINDLING HEALTH CARE REFORM

National Health Insurance or Incremental Reform: Aim High, or at Our Feet?

David U. Himmelstein, MD and Steffie Woolhandler, MD, MPH

The authors are with the Department of Medicine, Cambridge Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Mass, and Physicians for a National Health Program, Chicago, Ill.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to David U. Himmelstein, MD, 1493 Cambridge St, Cambridge MA 02139 (e-mail: dhimmelstein{at}challiance.org).

Single-payer national health insurance could cover the uninsured and upgrade coverage for most Americans without increasing costs; savings on insurance overhead and other bureaucracy would fully offset the costs of improved care. In contrast, proposed incremental reforms are projected to cover a fraction of the uninsured, at great cost.

Moreover, even these projections are suspect; reforms of the past quarter century have not stemmed the erosion of coverage. Despite incrementalists’ claims of pragmatism, they have proven unable to shepherd meaningful reform through the political system.

While national health insurance is often dismissed as ultra left by the policy community, it is dead center in public opinion. Polls have consistently shown that at least 40%, and perhaps 60%, of Americans favor such reform.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
P. M. Carrera, K. K. Siemens, and J. Bridges
Health Care Financing Reforms in Germany: The Case for Rethinking the Evolutionary Approach to Reforms
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, October 1, 2008; 33(5): 979 - 1005.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. Bitton and J. G. Kahn
Government Share of Health Care Expenditures
JAMA, March 5, 2003; 289(9): 1165 - 1165.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Public Health Association