HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Coller, M. Articles by McInnes, M. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Coller, M. Articles by McInnes, M. M. Related Collections Other Health Financing Health Law Health Policy Other Tobacco

Maribeth Coller, PhD, Glenn W. Harrison, PhD and Melayne Morgan McInnes, PhD

The authors are with the Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina, Columbia.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Glenn W. Harrison, PhD, Department of Economics, Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 (e-mail: harrison{at}moore.badm.sc.edu).

Objectives. This study compared the present economic value of the 1998 tobacco settlement with the present economic value of the damages attributable to tobacco.

Methods. The 1987 National Medical Expenditure Survey was used to estimate the smoking attributable fraction (SAF) of medical expenditures. SAFs were then applied to Medicaid and other expenditures.

Results. Settlement payments covered only 40% of Medicaid treatment costs already incurred and only 30% of past and projected future Medicaid costs. Excess medical expenditures for all other payment sources were roughly comparable to those incurred by Medicaid.

Conclusions. Although the settlement may reduce future smoking prevalence rates by limiting the ability of tobacco companies to promote smoking and by raising cigarette prices, euphoria over the huge settlement funds should be balanced by a sober comparison with the even larger damage amounts.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Max and T. Tsoukalas Economics on trial: the use and abuse of economic methods in third party tobacco litigation Tob. Control, December 1, 2006; 15(suppl_4): iv77 - iv83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. A. Sloan, E. S. Carlisle, J. R. Rattliff, and J. Trogdon Determinants of States' Allocations of the Master Settlement Agreement Payments Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, August 1, 2005; 30(4): 643 - 686. [Abstract] [PDF]