AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bayer, R.
Right arrow Articles by Colgrove, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bayer, R.
Right arrow Articles by Colgrove, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Tobacco Control
Right arrow Environmental Tobacco Smoke
Right arrow Health Law
Right arrow Government
June 2002, Vol 92, No. 6 | American Journal of Public Health 949-954
© 2002 American Public Health Association


RESEARCH AND PRACTICE

Science, Politics, and Ideology in the Campaign Against Environmental Tobacco Smoke

Ronald Bayer, PhD and James Colgrove, MPH

The authors are with the Program in the History and Ethics of Public Health and Medicine, Division of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Ronald Bayer, PhD, Columbia University, 600 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (e-mail: rb8{at}columbia.edu).

The issue of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and the harms it causes to nonsmoking bystanders has occupied a central place in the rhetoric and strategy of antismoking forces in the United States over the past 3 decades. Beginning in the 1970s, anti-tobacco activists drew on suggestive and incomplete evidence to push for far-reaching prohibitions on smoking in a variety of public settings. Public health professionals and other antismoking activists, although concerned about the potential illness and death that ETS might cause in nonsmokers, also used restrictions on public smoking as a way to erode the social acceptability of cigarettes and thereby reduce smoking prevalence. This strategy was necessitated by the context of American political culture, especially the hostility toward public health interventions that are overtly paternalistic.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
J. Colgrove and R. Bayer
Manifold Restraints: Liberty, Public Health, and the Legacy of Jacobson v Massachusetts
Am J Public Health, April 1, 2005; 95(4): 571 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
J. G. Hodge Jr. and G. B. Eber
Tobacco Control Legislation: Tools for Public Health Improvement
J. Law Med. Ethics, September 1, 2004; 32(3): 516 - 523.
[PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
A. Fairchild and J. Colgrove
Out of the Ashes: The Life, Death, and Rebirth of the "Safer" Cigarette in the United States
Am J Public Health, February 1, 2004; 94(2): 192 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Public Health Association