AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow purchase articles
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Get other permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilpin, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pierce, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gilpin, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pierce, J. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health Law
Right arrow Occupational Health
Right arrow Other Child and Adolescent Health
Right arrow Smoking Cessation
Right arrow Tobacco Control
Right arrow Secondhand Smoke
Right arrow Other Environment
May 2002, Vol 92, No. 5 | American Journal of Public Health 785-791
© 2002 American Public Health Association

RESEARCH AND PRACTICE

Clean Indoor Air: Advances in California, 1990–1999

Elizabeth A. Gilpin, MS, Arthur J. Farkas, PhD, Sherry L. Emery, PhD, Christopher F. Ake, PhD and John P. Pierce, PhD

The authors are with the Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to John P. Pierce, PhD, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0645 (e-mail: jppierce{at}ucsd.edu).

Objectives. This study assessed progress in achieving clean indoor air in California.

Methods. Data were from large, cross-sectional population-based surveys (1990–1999).

Results. Indoor workers reporting smoke-free workplaces increased from 35.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 33.7, 36.3) in 1990 to 93.4% (95% CI = 92.6, 94.2) in 1999. Exposure of nonsmoking indoor workers to secondhand tobacco smoke decreased from 29.0% (95% CI = 27.2, 30.8) to 15.6% (95% CI = 14.1, 17.1). Adults with smoke-free homes increased from 37.6 % (95% CI = 35.1, 40.1) in 1992 to 73.7% (95% CI = 73.2, 74.2) in 1999; nearly half of smokers in 1999 had smoke-free homes. In 1999, 82.2% (95% CI = 81.5, 82.9) of children and adolescents (0–17 years) had smoke-free homes, up from 38.0% (95% CI = 35.1, 40.9) in 1992.

Conclusions. California's advances highlight an important opportunity for tobacco control.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Tobacco ControlHome page
S C Hill and L Liang
Smoking in the home and children's health
Tob. Control, February 1, 2008; 17(1): 32 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Tobacco ControlHome page
C. L Schmitt, A. M Malarcher, P. I Clark, J. M Bombard, W. Strauss, and F. A Stillman
Community guide recommendations and state level tobacco control programmes: 1999 2004
Tob. Control, October 1, 2007; 16(5): 318 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
R. Phillips, A. Amos, D. Ritchie, S. Cunningham-Burley, and C. Martin
Smoking in the home after the smoke-free legislation in Scotland: qualitative study
BMJ, September 15, 2007; 335(7619): 553 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
G. Thomson, N. Wilson, and P. Howden-Chapman
Population level policy options for increasing the prevalence of smokefree homes.
J Epidemiol Community Health, April 1, 2006; 60(4): 298 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Policy Politics Nursing PracticeHome page
L. W. Greathouse, E. J. Hahn, C. T. C. Okoli, T. A. Warnick, and C. A. Riker
Passing a Smoke-Free Law in a Pro-Tobacco Culture: A Multiple Streams Approach
Policy Politics Nursing Practice, August 1, 2005; 6(3): 211 - 220.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Tobacco ControlHome page
J P Pierce, M M White, and E A Gilpin
Adolescent smoking decline during California's tobacco control programme
Tob. Control, June 1, 2005; 14(3): 207 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
B. W. Stewart and A. S. Coates
Cancer Prevention: A Global Perspective
J. Clin. Oncol., January 10, 2005; 23(2): 392 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Tobacco ControlHome page
E A Gilpin, L Lee, and J P Pierce
Changes in population attitudes about where smoking should not be allowed: California versus the rest of the USA
Tob. Control, March 1, 2004; 13(1): 38 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Tobacco ControlHome page
E A Gilpin, L Lee, J P Pierce, H Tang, and J Lloyd
Support for protection from secondhand smoke: California 2002
Tob. Control, March 1, 2004; 13(1): 96 - 96.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Tobacco ControlHome page
D Hennrikus, P R Pentel, and S D Sandell
Preferences and practices among renters regarding smoking restrictions in apartment buildings
Tob. Control, June 1, 2003; 12(2): 189 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Public HealthHome page
M. E. Northridge, G. N. Stover, J. E. Rosenthal, and D. Sherard
Environmental Equity and Health: Understanding Complexity and Moving Forward
Am J Public Health, February 1, 2003; 93(2): 209 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Public Health Association