|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE |
Martin Fishbein, Kathleen Hall-Jamieson, Eric Zimmer, and Ina von Haeften are with the Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Robin Nabi is with the Department of Communication, University of Arizona at Tucson.
Correspondence: Request for reprints should be sent to Martin Fishbein, PhD, Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (email: mfishbein{at}asc.upenn.edu).
Objectives. This study examined the relative perceived effectiveness of 30 antidrug public service announcements (PSAs) and assessed the extent to which judgments of effectiveness are related to judgments of realism, amount learned, and positive and negative emotional responses.
Methods. Data were obtained from 3608 students in grades 5 through 12 in 10 schools. The ethnically diverse sample was 50.8% male. Students in 5 experimental conditions viewed sets of 6 antidrug PSAs and filled out a brief evaluation questionnaire following each PSA. Those in the control condition viewed a nondrug-related television program.
Results. The relative perceived effectiveness of the 30 PSAs varied considerably. Sixteen were rated as significantly more effective, and 6 as significantly less effective, than the control program. Relative rated effectiveness was highly related to realism (r = .87), amount learned (r = .88), negative emotion (r = .87), and positive emotion (r = .35).
Conclusions. Evaluative research is necessary to prevent broadcast of PSAs that could have a negative impact. PSAs should point out the negative consequences of drug use behavior rather than telling adolescents to "just say no."
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. A. Strasser, J. N. Cappella, C. Jepson, M. Fishbein, K. Z. Tang, E. Han, and C. Lerman Experimental evaluation of antitobacco PSAs: Effects of message content and format on physiological and behavioral outcomes Nicotine Tob Res, March 1, 2009; 11(3): 293 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. D. Whittingham, R. A. C. Ruiter, D. Castermans, A. Huiberts, and G. Kok Designing effective health education materials: experimental pre-testing of a theory-based brochure to increase knowledge Health Educ. Res., June 1, 2008; 23(3): 414 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Cho and F. J. Boster First and Third Person Perceptions on Anti-Drug Ads Among Adolescents Communication Research, April 1, 2008; 35(2): 169 - 189. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-J. Paek and A. C. Gunther How Peer Proximity Moderates Indirect Media Influence on Adolescent Smoking Communication Research, August 1, 2007; 34(4): 407 - 432. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Henriksen, A L Dauphinee, Y Wang, and S P Fortmann Industry sponsored anti-smoking ads and adolescent reactance: test of a boomerang effect Tob. Control, February 1, 2006; 15(1): 13 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Segrin Communication and the Study of Personal Well-Being International Communication Gazette, December 1, 2005; 67(6): 547 - 549. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Kelder, C. Pechmann, M. D. Slater, J. K. Worden, and A. Levitt THE NATIONAL YOUTH ANTI-DRUG MEDIA CAMPAIGN Am J Public Health, August 1, 2002; 92(8): 1211 - 1212. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |