AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fortenberry, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Orr, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fortenberry, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Orr, D. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adolescent Health
Right arrow Contraception
Right arrow Prevention
Right arrow Sexual Health
February 2002, Vol 92, No. 2 | American Journal of Public Health 211-213
© 2002 American Public Health Association


RESEARCH AND PRACTICE

Condom Use as a Function of Time in New and Established Adolescent Sexual Relationships

J. Dennis Fortenberry, MD, MS, Wanzhu Tu, PhD, Jaroslaw Harezlak, MS, Barry P. Katz, PhD and Donald P. Orr, MD

The authors are with the Section of Adolescent Medicine, Division of Biostatistics, and the Regenstrief Institute for Health Care, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to J. Dennis Fortenberry, MD, MS, Riley Hospital Parking Garage, 575 N West Dr, Room 070, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5205 (e-mail: jfortenb{at}iupui.edu).

Objectives. This study sought to describe condom use over time in new and established adolescent relationships.

Methods. The outcome variable was time (in days) until first unprotected coital event. Analyses involved comparisons of Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results. Survival functions for the 2 relationship groups were significantly different. However, by 21 days the curves had converged: 43% of new and 41% of established relationships involved no unprotected coital events. Time to first unprotected coital event was significantly longer in new than in established relationships.

Conclusions. Prolongation of condom use in ongoing relationships may be a useful intervention to prevent sexually transmitted diseases.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
R. J. DiClemente, C. P. Crittenden, E. Rose, J. M. Sales, G. M. Wingood, R. A. Crosby, and L. F. Salazar
Psychosocial Predictors of HIV-Associated Sexual Behaviors and the Efficacy of Prevention Interventions in Adolescents at-Risk for HIV Infection: What Works and What Doesn't Work?
Psychosom Med, June 1, 2008; 70(5): 598 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Youth SocietyHome page
S. Ryan, K. Franzetta, and J. Manlove
Knowledge, Perceptions, and Motivations for Contraception: Influence on Teens' Contraceptive Consistency
Youth Society, December 1, 2007; 39(2): 182 - 208.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
R. J. DiClemente, L. F. Salazar, and R. A. Crosby
A Review of STD/HIV Preventive Interventions for Adolescents: Sustaining Effects Using an Ecological Approach
J. Pediatr. Psychol., September 1, 2007; 32(8): 888 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
J A Cassell, C H Mercer, J Imrie, A J Copas, and A M Johnson
Who uses condoms with whom? Evidence from national probability sample surveys
Sex. Transm. Inf., December 1, 2006; 82(6): 467 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
A Khan, J D Fortenberry, M H Temkit, W Tu, D P Orr, and B E Batteiger
Gender differences in sexual behaviours in response to genitourinary symptoms
Sex. Transm. Inf., June 1, 2005; 81(3): 262 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Public Health Association