|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE |
Janet S. St. Lawrence and Jami S. Leichliter are with the Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga. Daniel E. Montaño, Danuta Kasprzyk, William R. Phillips, and Keira Armstrong are with the Battelle Centers for Public Health Research and Evaluation, Seattle, Wash. William R. Phillips is also with the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Janet S. St. Lawrence, PhD, Behavioral Interventions and Research Branch, Division of STD Prevention, Mail Stop E-44, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, Atlanta, GA 30329 (e-mail: nzs4{at}cdc.gov).
Objectives. This study presents results from a national survey of US physicians that assessed screening, case reporting, partner management, and clinical practices for syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, and HIV infection.
Methods. Surveys were mailed to a random sample of 7300 physicians to assess screening, testing, reporting, and partner notification for syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, and HIV.
Results. Fewer than one third of physicians routinely screened men or women (pregnant or nonpregnant) for STDs. Case reporting was lowest for chlamydia (37%), intermediate for gonorrhea (44%), and higher for syphilis, HIV, and AIDS (53%57%). Physicians instructed patients to notify their partners (82%89%) or the health department (25%34%) rather than doing so themselves.
Conclusions. STD screening levels are well below practice guidelines for women and virtually nonexistent for men. Case reporting levels are below those legally mandated; physicians rely instead on patients for partner notification. Health departments must increase collaboration with private physicians to improve the quality of STD care.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Trelle, A. Shang, L. Nartey, J. A Cassell, and N. Low Improved effectiveness of partner notification for patients with sexually transmitted infections: systematic review BMJ, February 17, 2007; 334(7589): 354 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L M Niccolai, J R Ickovics, K Zeller, T S Kershaw, S Milan, J B Lewis, and K A Ethier Knowledge of sex partner treatment for past bacterial STI and risk of current STI Sex Transm Inf, June 1, 2005; 81(3): 271 - 275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Golden, W. L.H. Whittington, H. H. Handsfield, J. P. Hughes, W. E. Stamm, M. Hogben, A. Clark, C. Malinski, J. R.L. Helmers, K. K. Thomas, et al. Effect of Expedited Treatment of Sex Partners on Recurrent or Persistent Gonorrhea or Chlamydial Infection N. Engl. J. Med., February 17, 2005; 352(7): 676 - 685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C A Porter, D Thompson, and E J Erbelding Differences in demographics and risk factors among men attending public v non-public STD clinics in Baltimore, Maryland Sex Transm Inf, December 1, 2004; 80(6): 488 - 491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Chorba, D. Scholes, J. BlueSpruce, B. H. Operskalski, and K. Irwin Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Managed Care: An Inquiry and Review of Issues Affecting Service Delivery American Journal of Medical Quality, July 1, 2004; 19(4): 145 - 156. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. C. Levine, L. W. Dicker, O. Devine, and D. J. Mosure Indirect Estimation of Chlamydia Screening Coverage Using Public Health Surveillance Data Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2004; 160(1): 91 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. C. Miller, C. A. Ford, M. Morris, M. S. Handcock, J. L. Schmitz, M. M. Hobbs, M. S. Cohen, K. M. Harris, and J. R. Udry Prevalence of Chlamydial and Gonococcal Infections Among Young Adults in the United States JAMA, May 12, 2004; 291(18): 2229 - 2236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Hogben, J S St Lawrence, D E Montano, D Kasprzyk, J S Leichliter, and W R Phillips Physicians' opinions about partner notification methods: case reporting, patient referral, and provider referral Sex Transm Inf, February 1, 2004; 80(1): 30 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Adam INSURANCE AND NONINVASIVE SCREENING FOR STDS Am J Public Health, July 1, 2003; 93(7): 1033 - 1034. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Mann SCREENING FOR STDS AND TREATING INFECTED PARTNERS Am J Public Health, July 1, 2003; 93(7): 1038 - 1039. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D H McCree, N C Liddon, M Hogben, and J S St Lawrence National survey of doctors' actions following the diagnosis of a bacterial STD Sex Transm Inf, June 1, 2003; 79(3): 254 - 256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |