|
|
||||||||
David J. Hess is with the Science and Technology Studies Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to David J. Hess, PhD, Science and Technology Studies Department, RPI, 110 8th St, Sage Bldg 5th Floor, Troy, NY 12180-3590 (e-mail: hessd{at}rpi.edu).
Scientific research is particularly important as a guide to health care policy regarding the "integration" of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) into conventional medical practices. A spectrum of possibilities has emerged around the question of balancing integration toward complementary vs alternative usages.
Although scientific research can guide policies and practices, it has become subject to greater scrutiny and linked to differences on policy issues. Using CAM cancer therapies as a case study, this commentary explores relationships between methodology and policy regarding the integration of CAM therapies.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. M. Spenceley, L. Reutter, and M. N. Allen The road less traveled: nursing advocacy at the policy level. Policy Politics Nursing Practice, August 1, 2006; 7(3): 180 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zuess Complementary and Alternative Medicine and Mental Health Care: Shared Challenges Complementary Health Practice Review, October 1, 2003; 8(3): 193 - 197. [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |