AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauserman, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Swetz, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bauserman, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Swetz, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow HIV/AIDS
August 2001, Vol 91, No. 8 | American Journal of Public Health 1226-1229
© 2001 American Public Health Association


RESEARCH

Increasing Voluntary HIV Testing by Offering Oral Tests in Incarcerated Populations

Robert L. Bauserman, PhD, Michael A. Ward, DDS, MPH, Lois Eldred, DrPH, MPH and Anthony Swetz, PhD

Robert L. Bauserman, Michael A. Ward, and Lois Eldred are with the AIDS Administration, Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, and Anthony Swetz is with Inmate Health Care, Maryland Department of Corrections, Baltimore, Md.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Robert L. Bauserman, PhD, Center for Planning and Evaluation, AIDS Administration, DHMH, 500 N Calvert St, Baltimore, MD 21202 (e-mail: bausermanr{at}dhmh.state.md.us).

Objectives. This study reports responses of incarcerated persons to voluntary blood and oral HIV testing.

Methods. Males and females in local detention and juvenile justice facilities in Maryland (n = 1314) chose oral or blood testing and reported reactions to the oral HIV test. The relationship of demographics and HIV risk factors to test choice was examined.

Results. Reactions to oral testing were very favorable; some participants reported that they would not otherwise have been tested. Participants who chose oral testing were more likely to be male and African American, but they did not differ from those who chose blood testing in most risk factors or in seroprevalence.

Conclusions. Oral HIV testing in correctional settings may promote voluntary testing among persons who otherwise would refuse or avoid testing, especially among groups (males and African Americans) disproportionately affected by HIV.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Public Health Association