American Journal of Public Health, Vol 91, Issue 7 1100-1106, Copyright © 2001 by American Public Health Association

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Counteracting tobacco motor sports sponsorship as a promotional tool: is the tobacco settlement enough?

M Siegel
Boston University School of Public Health, Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, 715 Albany St, TW2, Boston, MA 02118, USA. mbsiegel@bu.edu

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to quantify television advertising exposure achieved by tobacco companies through sponsorship of motor sports events and to evaluate the likely effect of the Master Settlement Agreement on this advertising. METHODS: Data from Sponsors Report, which quantifies the exposure that sponsors of selected televised sporting events receive during broadcasts of those events, were compiled for all motor sports events covered by the service for the period 1997 through 1999. RESULTS: From 1997 through 1999, tobacco companies achieved 169 hours of television advertising exposure and $410.5 million of advertising value for their products by sponsoring motor sports events. If tobacco companies comply with the Master Settlement Agreement and maintain their advertising at 1999 levels, they will still be able to achieve more than 25 hours of television exposure and an equivalent television advertising value of $99.1 million per year. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a federal ban on tobacco advertising on television, tobacco companies achieve the equivalent of more than $150 million in television advertising per year through their sponsorship of motor sports events. The Master Settlement Agreement likely will do little to address this problem.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. Ellis, S. B. Perl, K. Davis, and L. Vichinsky Gender Differences in Smoking and Cessation Behaviors Among Young Adults After Implementation of Local Comprehensive Tobacco Control Am J Public Health, February 1, 2008; 98(2): 310 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. G. Klein and R. J. Jones-Webb TOBACCO AND ALCOHOL ADVERTISING IN TELEVISED SPORTS: TIME TO FOCUS ON POLICY CHANGE Am J Public Health, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 198 - 198. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. MacKenzie, J. Collin, and K. Sriwongcharoen Thailand--lighting up a dark market: British American tobacco, sports sponsorship and the circumvention of legislation J. Epidemiol. Community Health, January 1, 2007; 61(1): 28 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Zwarun Ten Years and 1 Master Settlement Agreement Later: The Nature and Frequency of Alcohol and Tobacco Promotion in Televised Sports, 2000 Through 2002 Am J Public Health, August 1, 2006; 96(8): 1492 - 1497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A Smith, N. Offen, and R. E Malone What makes an ad a cigarette ad? Commercial tobacco imagery in the lesbian, gay, and bisexual press J. Epidemiol. Community Health, December 1, 2005; 59(12): 1086 - 1091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M Siegel Food and Drug Administration regulation of tobacco: snatching defeat from the jaws of victory Tob. Control, December 1, 2004; 13(4): 439 - 441. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. T. Braverman and L. E. Aaro Adolescent Smoking and Exposure to Tobacco Marketing Under a Tobacco Advertising Ban: Findings From 2 Norwegian National Samples Am J Public Health, July 1, 2004; 94(7): 1230 - 1238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. M. Lynch and J. Dunn Scoreboard advertising at sporting events as a health promotion medium Health Educ. Res., August 1, 2003; 18(4): 488 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T Dewhirst and A Hunter Tobacco sponsorship of Formula One and CART auto racing: tobacco brand exposure and enhanced symbolic imagery through co-sponsors' third party advertising Tob. Control, June 1, 2002; 11(2): 146 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]