|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Public Health, Vol 91, Issue 4 559-562, Copyright © 2001 by American Public Health Association
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
M Greenberg
Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, 33 Livingston Ave, Suite 100, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1958, USA. mrg@rci.rutgers.edu
A clear majority of Americans are concerned about environmental threats to public health and do not want to weaken antipollution regulations. The strongest supporters for maintaining environmental regulations are affluent mainstream White suburban populations who are thriving economically, but support is also strong in every other major segment of the population. Overt attempts to weaken the basic regulations are unlikely, barring an obvious economic downturn that would cause a large proportion of the public to consider loosening standards in the belief that such changes would increase the number of available jobs. Given this context, environmental health was and will continue to be a core topic in the Journal. We will emphasize the nexus of environmental health and policy by publishing research, exemplary public health practice, and the views of key decision makers.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Wang, C. A. Macera, B. Scudder-Soucie, T. Schmid, M. Pratt, D. Buchner, and G. Heath Cost Analysis of the Built Environment: The Case of Bike and Pedestrian Trials in Lincoln, Neb Am J Public Health, April 1, 2004; 94(4): 549 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |