| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
American Journal of Public Health, Vol 91, Issue 2 245-252, Copyright © 2001 by American Public Health Association
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
S Magzamen and SA Glantz
Institute for Health Policy Studies, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the tobacco industry's tactics in the political, grassroots, and media arenas in attempting to subvert California's smoke-free bar law, and the efforts of health advocates to uphold and promote the law by using the same 3 channels. METHODS: Interviews with key informants involved in the development and implementation of the smoke-free bar law were conducted. Information was gathered from bill analyses, internal memoranda, tobacco industry documents, media articles, and press releases. RESULTS: The tobacco industry worked both inside the legislature and through a public relations campaign to attempt to delay implementation of the law and to encourage noncompliance once the law was in effect. Health groups were able to uphold the law by framing the law as a health and worker safety issue. The health groups were less successful in pressing the state to implement the law. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to enact and defend smoke-free bar laws, but doing so requires a substantial and sustained commitment by health advocates. The tobacco industry will fight this latest generation of clean indoor air laws even more aggressively than general workplace laws.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. M Sebrie and S. A Glantz "Accommodating" smoke-free policies: tobacco industry's Courtesy of Choice programme in Latin America Tob. Control, October 1, 2007; 16(5): e6 - e6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. L. York and E. J. Hahn The Community Readiness Model: Evaluating Local Smoke-Free Policy Development Policy Politics Nursing Practice, August 1, 2007; 8(3): 184 - 200. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. S Moore, J. P Lee, T. M J Antin, and S. E Martin Tobacco free workplace policies and low socioeconomic status female bartenders in San Francisco J. Epidemiol. Community Health, September 1, 2006; 60(suppl_2): ii51 - ii56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P M Ling and S A Glantz Tobacco industry consumer research on socially acceptable cigarettes Tob. Control, October 1, 2005; 14(5): e3 - e3. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H Tang, D W Cowling, C M Stevens, and J C Lloyd Changes of knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and preference of bar owner and staff in response to a smoke-free bar law Tob. Control, March 1, 2004; 13(1): 87 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Drope and S Glantz British Columbia capital regional district 100% smokefree bylaw: a successful public health campaign despite industry opposition Tob. Control, September 1, 2003; 12(3): 264 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M D Weber, D A S Bagwell, J E Fielding, and S A Glantz Long term compliance with California's Smoke-Free Workplace Law among bars and restaurants in Los Angeles County Tob. Control, September 1, 2003; 12(3): 269 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Tsoukalas and S. A. Glantz The Duluth Clean Indoor Air Ordinance: Problems and Success in Fighting the Tobacco Industry at the Local Level in the 21st Century Am J Public Health, August 1, 2003; 93(8): 1214 - 1221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Skeer and M Siegel The descriptive epidemiology of local restaurant smoking regulations in Massachusetts: an analysis of the protection of restaurant customers and workers Tob. Control, June 1, 2003; 12(2): 221 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Scollo, A Lal, A Hyland, and S Glantz Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry Tob. Control, March 1, 2003; 12(1): 13 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. D. Jacobson and S. Soliman Co-opting the Health and Human Rights Movement J. Law Med. Ethics, December 1, 2002; 30(4): 705 - 715. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. M Fichtenberg and S. A Glantz Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review BMJ, July 27, 2002; 325(7357): 188 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. M. Ling and S. A. Glantz Using Tobacco-Industry Marketing Research to Design More Effective Tobacco-Control Campaigns JAMA, June 12, 2002; 287(22): 2983 - 2989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. Ling and S. A. Glantz Why and How the Tobacco Industry Sells Cigarettes to Young Adults: Evidence From Industry Documents Am J Public Health, June 1, 2002; 92(6): 908 - 916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. J. Bartosch and G. C. Pope Local Enactment of Tobacco Control Policies in Massachusetts Am J Public Health, June 1, 2002; 92(6): 941 - 943. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Sepe, P. M. Ling, and S. A. Glantz Smooth Moves: Bar and Nightclub Tobacco Promotions That Target Young Adults Am J Public Health, March 1, 2002; 92(3): 414 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. V. Dearlove and S. A. Glantz Boards of Health as Venues for Clean Indoor Air Policy Making Am J Public Health, February 1, 2002; 92(2): 257 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Sepe and S. A. Glantz Bar and Club Tobacco Promotions in the Alternative Press: Targeting Young Adults Am J Public Health, January 1, 2002; 92(1): 75 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Fox Removing Barriers to Local Tobacco Regulation JAMA, December 5, 2001; 286(21): 2735 - 2735. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Glantz and W. W. Parmley Even a Little Secondhand Smoke Is Dangerous JAMA, July 25, 2001; 286(4): 462 - 463. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. K. Ong and S. A. Glantz Free Nicotine Replacement Therapy Programs vs Implementing Smoke-Free Workplaces: A Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Am J Public Health, June 1, 2005; 95(6): 969 - 975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
