|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH |
Jeanne S. Ringel is with the RAND Corp, Santa Monica, Calif. William N. Evans is with the Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park; the National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass; and Project HOPE, Bethesda, MD.
Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to William N. Evans, PhD, Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 (e-mail: evans{at}econ.umd.edu).
Objectives. This study sought to estimate how changes in state cigarette excise taxes affect the smoking behavior of pregnant women.
Methods. Detailed information about mothers and their pregnancy was used to examine the impact of taxes on the propensity of pregnant women to smoke. The 1989 to 1995 Natality Detail Files were used in conducting analyses to assess the impact of taxes on smoking among different subpopulations.
Results. Higher cigarette excise taxes reduced smoking rates among pregnant women. A tax hike of $0.55 per pack would reduce maternal smoking by about 22%. Overall, a 10% increase in price would reduce smoking rates by 7%. Estimates for subpopulations suggested that nearly all would be very responsive to tax changes, including the subpopulations with the highest smoking rates.
Conclusions. Smoking rates among pregnant women are responsive to tax hikes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S Thomas, D Fayter, K Misso, D Ogilvie, M Petticrew, A Sowden, M Whitehead, and G Worthy Population tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking: systematic review Tob. Control, August 1, 2008; 17(4): 230 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Perreira and K. E. Cortes Race/Ethnicity and Nativity Differences in Alcohol and Tobacco Use During Pregnancy Am J Public Health, September 1, 2006; 96(9): 1629 - 1636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |