AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Samet, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Burke, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Samet, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Burke, T. A.
November 2001, Vol 91, No. 11 | American Journal of Public Health 1742-1744
© 2001 American Public Health Association


TOBACCO, LAWYERS, AND PUBLIC HEALTH

Turning Science Into Junk: The Tobacco Industry and Passive Smoking

Jonathan M. Samet, MD, MS and Thomas A. Burke, PhD, MPH

Jonathan M. Samet is with the Department of Epidemiology, and Thomas A. Burke is with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.

Correspondence: Requests for reprints should be sent to Jonathan M. Samet, MD, MS, Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Room W6041, Baltimore, MD 21205 (e-mail: jsamet{at}jhsph.edu).

ABSTRACT

In this issue, Glantz and Ong offer a powerful analysis of the tobacco industry's attempt to discredit the scientific evidence on passive smoking, particularly the industry's use of the label "junk science." Environmental epidemiologic studies in other arenas have also been targets for the "junk science" label.

Lessons for researchers involved in high-stakes issues in the public policy arena include a need for awareness of competing interests, for transparency concerning funding, and for adherence to rigorous quality assurance and peer review practices. The goal of "sound science" seems an admirable one; it should not, however, be used to dismiss available but uncertain evidence in order to delay action.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
S. F Schick and S. A Glantz
Old ways, new means: tobacco industry funding of academic and private sector scientists since the Master Settlement Agreement
Tob. Control, June 1, 2007; 16(3): 157 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
J. A Francis, A. K Shea, and J. M Samet
Challenging the epidemiologic evidence on passive smoking: tactics of tobacco industry expert witnesses
Tob. Control, December 1, 2006; 15(suppl_4): iv68 - iv76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
P. Brown, S. McCormick, B. Mayer, S. Zavestoski, R. Morello-Frosch, R. G. Altman, and L. Senier
"A Lab of Our Own": Environmental Causation of Breast Cancer and Challenges to the Dominant Epidemiological Paradigm
Science Technology Human Values, September 1, 2006; 31(5): 499 - 536.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
A. Gildiner
Politics Dressed as Science: Two Think Tanks on Environmental Regulation and Health
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, April 1, 2004; 29(2): 313 - 322.
[PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
S. P. Brown
"SOUND SCIENCE" AND TOBACCO EXPOSURE
Am J Public Health, June 1, 2002; 92(6): 891 - 891.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

"Junk decisions" by local lawmakers
Sharon Brown
AJPH Online, 3 Dec 2001 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Public Health Association