|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Public Health, Vol 91, Issue 1 55-61, Copyright © 2001 by American Public Health Association
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
SA Fox, JA Stein, RJ Sockloskie and MG Ory
RAND, 1700 Main St, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA. sarah_fox@rand.org
OBJECTIVES: Older women have the highest breast cancer rates but are underscreened relative to their risk. Racial/ethnic minority women especially have low screening rates, often because of financial constraints. In response, Medicare introduced subsidized biennial mammogram benefits in 1991. This study examined the effect on mammography rates of an intervention that informed women about the Medicare benefit. METHODS: A list frame method of subject selection was used to select random samples of eligible women from the Health Care Financing Administration's master beneficiary file. Women were interviewed by telephone in 1991 (N = 917) before the targeted mailing and in 1993 (N = 922). One control and 2 treatment communities participated. RESULTS: Mammogram use increased significantly among minorities in the treatment groups. Among minorities who received the intervention, Black women were twice as likely (odds ratio = 1.97) and Hispanic women were more than twice as likely (odds ratio = 2.33) to undergo screening relative to their untreated cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: A targeted low-cost mailed intervention can help increase screening rates among elderly minority women. The Health Care Financing Administration should promote its benefits aggressively if it expects to reach its target--elderly beneficiaries.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. S. Slater, G. A. Henly, C. N. Ha, M. E. Malone, J. A. Nyman, S. Diaz, and P. G. McGovern Effect of Direct Mail as a Population-Based Strategy to Increase Mammography Use among Low-Income Underinsured Women Ages 40 to 64 Years Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2005; 14(10): 2346 - 2352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Michielutte, P. C. Sharp, K. L. Foley, L. E. Cunningham, J. G. Spangler, E. D. Paskett, and L. D. Case Intervention to increase screening mammography among women 65 and older Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2005; 20(2): 149 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Fox, P. Arnsberger, D. Owens, B. Nussey, X. Zhang, J. M. Golding, F. Tabnak, and R. Otero-Sabogal Patient and Clinical Site Factors Associated With Rescreening Behavior Among Older Multiethnic, Low-Income Women Gerontologist, February 1, 2004; 44(1): 76 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Townsend-Rocchiccioli and S. Steele Reimbursement for Screening Mammography--The Medicare Disparity: A Policy Perspective Policy Politics Nursing Practice, August 1, 2002; 3(3): 240 - 247. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Angel, J. L. Angel, and K. S. Markides Stability and Change in Health Insurance Among Older Mexican Americans: Longitudinal Evidence From the Hispanic Established Populations for Epidemiologic Study of the Elderly Am J Public Health, August 1, 2002; 92(8): 1264 - 1271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |