|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Public Health, Vol 90, Issue 9 1444-1448, Copyright © 2000 by American Public Health Association
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
GL Larkin, S Rolniak, KB Hyman, BA MacLeod and R Savage
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pa., USA. glarkin+@pitt.edu
OBJECTIVES: This study measured the effects of an administrative intervention on health care provider compliance with universal domestic violence screening protocols. METHODS: We used a simple, interrupted-time-series design in a stratified random sample of female emergency department patients 18 years or older (n = 1638 preintervention, n = 1617 postintervention). The intervention was a 4-tiered hospital-approved disciplinary action, and the primary outcome was screening compliance. RESULTS: Preintervention and postintervention screening rates were 29.5% and 72.8%, respectively. Before the intervention, screening was worse on the night shift (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.31, 0.68) and with psychiatric patients (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.14, 0.85); after the intervention, no previous screening barriers remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: An administrative intervention significantly enhanced compliance with universal domestic violence screening.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Lindhorst, M. Meyers, and E. Casey Screening for Domestic Violence in Public Welfare Offices: An Analysis of Case Manager and Client Interactions Violence Against Women, January 1, 2008; 14(1): 5 - 28. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Plichta Interactions Between Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women and the Health Care System: Policy and Practice Implications Trauma Violence Abuse, April 1, 2007; 8(2): 226 - 239. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. El-Bassel, L. Gilbert, E. Wu, M. Chang, C. Gomes, D. Vinocur, and T. Spevack Intimate partner violence prevalence and HIV risks among women receiving care in emergency departments: implications for IPV and HIV screening Emerg. Med. J., April 1, 2007; 24(4): 255 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Witting, J. P. Furuno, J. M. Hirshon, S. D. Krugman, A. R. S. Perisse, and R. Limcangco Support for emergency department screening for intimate partner violence depends on perceived risk. J Interpers Violence, May 1, 2006; 21(5): 585 - 596. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Stayton and M. M. Duncan Mutable Influences on Intimate Partner Abuse Screening in Health Care Settings: A Synthesis of the Literature Trauma Violence Abuse, October 1, 2005; 6(4): 271 - 285. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Plichta Intimate Partner Violence and Physical Health Consequences: Policy and Practice Implications J Interpers Violence, November 1, 2004; 19(11): 1296 - 1323. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Improving Compliance with Domestic Violence Screening Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, October 3, 2000; 2000(1003): 10 - 10. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |