American Journal of Public Health, Vol 90, Issue 9 1431-1435, Copyright © 2000 by American Public Health Association

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Accuracy of patients' recall of Pap and cholesterol screening

S Newell, A Girgis, R Sanson-Fisher and M Ireland
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Australia.

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken in mid-1994 and assessed how accurately patients recall the recency and result of their most recent cholesterol and Papanicolaou (Pap) tests. METHODS: A cross-sectional, door-to-door community survey was used to gather self-report and, subsequently, pathology laboratory data for 195 individuals. RESULTS: In regard to cholesterol screening, 30% of individuals who reported being adequately screened were actually inadequately screened, 45% who reported normal cholesterol levels actually had elevated levels, and 21% of inadequately screened individuals and 56% of individuals with elevated levels were not identified by self-report. In terms of Pap screening, 28% of women who reported being adequately screened were actually inadequately screened, 11% of patients who reported a normal Pap test actually had abnormal or inadequate results, and 55% of inadequately screened individuals and 53% of individuals with abnormal or inadequate results were not identified by self-report. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed self-report to be a less-than-adequate measure of individuals' recall of cholesterol and Pap screening. Relying exclusively on self-report surveys as indicators of screening coverage is likely to result in significant underestimations of the proportion of people who are inadequately screened or whose results indicate a need for intervention.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. H. Rauscher, T. P. Johnson, Y. I. Cho, and J. A. Walk Accuracy of Self-Reported Cancer-Screening Histories: A Meta-analysis Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 748 - 757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Bhandari and T. Wagner Self-reported utilization of health care services: improving measurement and accuracy. Med Care Res Rev, April 1, 2006; 63(2): 217 - 235. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Puleo, J. G. Zapka, K. V. Goins, M. U. Yood, J. Mouchawar, M. Manos, C. Somkin, and S. Taplin Recommendations for Care Related to Follow-Up of Abnormal Cancer Screening Tests: Accuracy of Patient Report Eval Health Prof, September 1, 2005; 28(3): 310 - 327. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Bernatsky, R. Ramsey-Goldman, C. Gordon, L. Joseph, J.-F. Boivin, R. Rajan, A. Allen, A. D. Moore, M.-H. Leung, and A. Clarke Factors associated with abnormal Pap results in systemic lupus erythematosus Rheumatology, November 1, 2004; 43(11): 1386 - 1389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Aitken, P. H. Youl, M. Janda, M. Elwood, I. T. Ring, J. B. Lowe, and D. W. Firman Validity of Self-reported Skin Screening Histories Am. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2004; 159(11): 1098 - 1105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. L. Trimble, L. A. Richards, B. Wilgus-Wegweiser, K. Plowden, D. L. Rosenthal, and A. Klassen Effectiveness of Screening for Cervical Cancer in an Inpatient Hospital Setting Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2004; 103(2): 310 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ostbye, G. N. Greenberg, D. H. Taylor Jr, and A. M. M. Lee Screening Mammography and Pap Tests Among Older American Women 1996-2000: Results from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD) Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2003; 1(4): 209 - 217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Budenholzer, H. G. Welch, M. Donohoe, S. N. Glick, A. L. Frazier, and K. M. Kuntz Cost-effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening JAMA, January 24, 2001; 285(4): 407 - 408. [Full Text] [PDF]