AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Des Jarlais, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Des Jarlais, D. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health Policy
Right arrow HIV/AIDS
Right arrow Drugs

American Journal of Public Health, Vol 90, Issue 9 1392-1394, Copyright © 2000 by American Public Health Association

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Research, politics, and needle exchange

DC Des Jarlais
Beth Israel Medical Center, Chemical Dependency Institute, New York, NY 10003, USA. dcdesjarla@aol.com

We now have had 15 years of public discussion of and research on needle exchange programs. The data have shown these programs to be usually, but not always, effective in limiting HIV transmission among injection drug users. Needle exchange programs are conceptualized within a larger framework of providing ready availability of sterile injection equipment for injection drug users. Continuing research is clearly needed regarding how to maximize the availability of sterile injection equipment and how to integrate this with other needed health and social services for drug users. Many initial opponents of needle exchange programs have become supporters of the programs. The number of programs in the United States has been increasing by about 20% per year, and this can be considered substantial progress in reducing HIV infection among injection drug users. Important opposition remains, however, based primarily on the symbolic values expressed in government support for the programs. These value conflicts over needle exchange, which have existed since it was first considered in the United States, cannot be resolved with data. In the late 1980s, the value conflicts greatly hampered the collection of relevant data--there was no federal funding of research on needle exchange programs. Currently, there is considerable research on needle exchange, but many researchers are quite concerned about possible misuse of findings. This may be considered progress to an important but modest degree. Whether current and future research will be used to improve HIV prevention efforts remains to be seen.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Policy Politics Nursing PracticeHome page
N. Murphy, M. K. Canales, S. A. Norton, and J. DeFilippis
Striving for Congruence: The Interconnection Between Values, Practice, and Political Action
Policy Politics Nursing Practice, February 1, 2005; 6(1): 20 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
K. E. Nelson, N. Galai, M. Safaeian, S. A. Strathdee, D. D. Celentano, and D. Vlahov
Temporal Trends in the Incidence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and Risk Behavior among Injection Drug Users in Baltimore, Maryland, 1988-1998
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2002; 156(7): 641 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Public Health Association