AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baris, D.
Right arrow Articles by Fraumeni, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baris, D.
Right arrow Articles by Fraumeni, J. F., Jr
Related Collections
Right arrow African Americans/Blacks
Right arrow Socioeconomic Factors
Right arrow Cancer

American Journal of Public Health, Vol 90, Issue 8 1277-1281, Copyright © 2000 by American Public Health Association


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Socioeconomic status and multiple myeloma among US blacks and whites

D Baris, LM Brown, DT Silverman, R Hayes, RN Hoover, GM Swanson, M Dosemeci, AG Schwartz, JM Liff, JB Schoenberg, LM Pottern, J Lubin, RS Greenberg and JF Fraumeni Jr
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7240, USA. barisd@epndce.nci.nih.gov

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relation between socioeconomic status (SES) and risk of multiple myeloma among Blacks and Whites in the United States. METHODS: This population-based case-control study included 573 cases (206 Blacks and 367 Whites) with new diagnoses of multiple myeloma identified between August 1, 1986, and April 30, 1989, and 2131 controls (967 Blacks and 1164 Whites) from 3 US geographic areas. Information on occupation, income, and education was obtained by personal interview. RESULTS: Inverse gradients in risk were associated with occupation-based SES, income, and education. Risks were significantly elevated for subjects in the lowest categories of occupation-based SES (odds ratio [OR] = 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16, 2.53), education (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.75), and income (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.93). Occupation-based low SES accounted for 37% of multiple myeloma in Blacks and 17% in Whites, as well as 49% of the excess incidence in Blacks. Low education and low income accounted for 17% and 28% of the excess incidence in Blacks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the measured SES-related factors account for a substantial amount of the Black-White differential in multiple myeloma incidence.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
O. Landgren, Y. Zhang, S. H. Zahm, P. Inskip, T. Zheng, and D. Baris
Risk of Multiple Myeloma following Medication Use and Medical Conditions: A Case-Control Study in Connecticut Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2006; 15(12): 2342 - 2347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Public Health Association