AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silvestre, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schelzel, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silvestre, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schelzel, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health Care Facilities/Services
Right arrow Health Professionals
Right arrow Quality of Care
Right arrow HIV/AIDS

American Journal of Public Health, Vol 90, Issue 7 1096-1099, Copyright © 2000 by American Public Health Association

JOURNAL ARTICLE

A participant observation study using actors at 30 publicly funded HIV counseling and testing sites in Pennsylvania

AJ Silvestre, MB Gehl, J Encandela and G Schelzel
Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pa., USA.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to augment an evaluation of Pennsylvania publicly funded HIV counseling and testing sites, particularly of the staff-client interaction. METHODS: Actors were trained as research assistants and sent to 30 randomly chosen sites to be tested and counseled for HIV disease. Instruments based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines were designed and used to evaluate them. RESULTS: Data were generated that identified the range of compliance with CDC guidelines and state policy. Among the findings were that 10 of 30 sites required signed consents despite a state policy allowing anonymous testing. Only 17% of providers developed a written risk reduction plan, even though 69% of all sites surveyed by mail asserted that such plans were developed. Only 2 of 5 HIV-positive actors were offered partner notification services, even though 100% of sites visited by an interviewer claimed to offer such services. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that although evaluation methods such as mail surveys and site visits are useful for evaluating the existence of appropriate policies and protocols and gathering baseline data, they might not be sufficient for assessing actual staff-client interaction.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PsychosomaticsHome page
L. A. Mistler, M. F. Brunette, B. J. Marsh, R. M. Vidaver, R. Luckoor, and S. D. Rosenberg
Hepatitis C treatment for people with severe mental illness.
Psychosomatics, March 1, 2006; 47(2): 93 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
J. Rosen, B. H. Mulsant, M. L. Bruce, V. Mittal, and D. Fox
Actors' Portrayals of Depression to Test Interrater Reliability in Clinical Trials
Am J Psychiatry, October 1, 2004; 161(10): 1909 - 1911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Public HealthHome page
J. S. St. Lawrence, D. E. Montano, D. Kasprzyk, W. R. Phillips, K. Armstrong, and J. S. Leichliter
STD Screening, Testing, Case Reporting, and Clinical and Partner Notification Practices: A National Survey of US Physicians
Am J Public Health, November 1, 2002; 92(11): 1784 - 1788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Public Health Association