|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Public Health, Vol 90, Issue 12 1848-1855, Copyright © 2000 by American Public Health Association
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
L Shi
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health and Hygiene, Baltimore, Md. 21205-1996, USA. lshi@jhsph.edu
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the association between type of health insurance coverage and quality of primary care as measured by its distinguishing attributes--first contact, longitudinality, comprehensiveness, and coordination. METHODS: The household component of the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey was used for this study. The analysis primarily focused on subjects aged younger than 65 years who identified a usual source of care. Logistic regressions were used to examine the independent effects of insurance status on primary care attributes while individual sociodemographic characteristics were controlled for. RESULTS: The experience of primary care varies according to insurance status. The insured are able to obtain better primary care than the uninsured, and the privately insured are able to obtain better primary care than the publicly insured. Those insured through fee-for-service coverage experience better longitudinal care and less of a barrier to access than those insured through health maintenance organizations (HMOs). CONCLUSIONS: While expanding insurance coverage is important for establishing access to care, efforts are needed to enhance the quality of primary health care, particularly for the publicly insured. Policymakers should closely monitor the quality of primary care provided by HMOs.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Graham, C. Goss, S. Xu, D. J. Magid, and C. Diguiseppi Effect of using different modes to administer the AUDIT-C on identification of hazardous drinking and acquiescence to trial participation among injured patients Alcohol Alcohol., September 1, 2007; 42(5): 423 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Malat Expanding research on the racial disparity in medical treatment with ideas from sociology. Health (London) , July 1, 2006; 10(3): 303 - 321. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Schootman, D. B Jeffe, E. A Baker, and M. S Walker Effect of area poverty rate on cancer screening across US communities. J. Epidemiol. Community Health, March 1, 2006; 60(3): 202 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Callahan and W. O. Cooper Gender and Uninsurance Among Young Adults in the United States Pediatrics, February 1, 2004; 113(2): 291 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Miller and H. S. Luft HMO Plan Performance Update: An Analysis Of The Literature, 1997-2001 Health Aff., July 1, 2002; 21(4): 63 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Malin, K. L. Kahn, J. Adams, L. Kwan, M. Laouri, and P. A. Ganz Validity of Cancer Registry Data for Measuring the Quality of Breast Cancer Care J Natl Cancer Inst, June 5, 2002; 94(11): 835 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Stevens and L. Shi Effect of Managed Care on Children's Relationships With Their Primary Care Physicians: Differences by Race Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, April 1, 2002; 156(4): 369 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |