|
|
||||||||
Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina School of Public Health, Chapel Hill 27599-7400, USA. davidvsavitz@unc.edu
This commentary examines the scope of epidemiology and delineates the role of epidemiology in relation to public health. Epidemiology is a science; public health is a mission that is implemented through societal action. The implications of this difference are considered, and the sufficiency of epidemiology for guiding public health is evaluated in relation to other scientific disciplines and nonscientific considerations. The authors conclude that epidemiology is not the basic science of public health but one of many contributors to guiding action. The need for public health decisions despite scientific uncertainty and the potential for epidemiologic certainty's failing to provide clear guidance to public health action emphasize the distinctiveness of these endeavors. Criticisms that epidemiology fails to solve major public health problems, such as tobacco use; that it overemphasizes methods; that it fails to meet the needs of public health practitioners; and that it isolates itself from public health ethics are unwarranted. However, epidemiology should focus on addressing issues that directly affect public health decisions and should clearly communicate information about such issues to public health workers. Public health is far more complex than merely applying epidemiology.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. W. Cohen and M. E. Northridge Getting Political: Racism and Urban Health Am J Public Health, September 1, 2008; 98(Supplement_1): S17 - S19. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Regidor, L. de la Fuente, J. L. Gutierrez-Fisac, S. de Mateo, C. Pascual, J. Sanchez-Paya, and E. Ronda The Role of the Public Health Official in Communicating Public Health Information Am J Public Health, April 1, 2007; 97(Supplement_1): S93 - S97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Joffe and J. Mindell Complex Causal Process Diagrams for Analyzing the Health Impacts of Policy Interventions Am J Public Health, March 1, 2006; 96(3): 473 - 479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Oakes An Analysis of American Journal of Epidemiology Citations with Special Reference to Statistics and Social Science Am. J. Epidemiol., March 1, 2005; 161(5): 494 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Shillis, B. A. Hall, G. G. Sneden, and N. H. Gottlieb Keeping the Focus on Public Health: The Struggles of a Tobacco Prevention Task Force Health Educ Behav, December 1, 2003; 30(6): 771 - 788. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Adams, M White, T Takano, K Nakamura, and M Watanabe Health benefits of green spaces not confirmed J. Epidemiol. Community Health, April 1, 2003; 57(4): 312 - 312. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Parascandola Objectivity and the neutral expert J. Epidemiol. Community Health, January 1, 2003; 57(1): 3 - 4. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Muntaner and J. Lynch Social capital, class gender and race conflict, and population health: an essay review of Bowling Alone's implications for social epidemiology: Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community.RD Putnam. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000, pp.544, US$26. ISBN: 0 684 83283 6. Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2002; 31(1): 261 - 267. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Parascandola and D L Weed Causation in epidemiology J. Epidemiol. Community Health, December 1, 2001; 55(12): 905 - 912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L Weed Commentary: A radical future for public health Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2001; 30(3): 440 - 441. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. T. Fujiura The Implications of Emerging Demographics: A Commentary on the Meaning of Race and Income Inequity to Disability Policy Journal of Disability Policy Studies, January 1, 2000; 11(2): 66 - 75. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |