|
|
||||||||
OBJECTIVES: This study assessed outcomes for children when child care centers meet recommended care standards. METHODS: Data from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care were used to examine the association between meeting standards for child-staff ratios, group sizes, caregiver training, and caregiver education and children's development at 24 and 36 months of age. RESULTS: There were 5 major findings: (1) most classes observed did not meet all 4 recommended standards (compliance ranged from 10% at 6 months of age to 34% at 36 months of age); (2) linear associations were found between number of standards met and child outcomes, and this was more the case at 36 months than at 24 months of age: (3) there was no evidence of threshold effects; (4) children in classes that met more standards had better school readiness and language comprehension scores as well as fewer behavior problems at 36 months of age; and (5) child outcomes were predicted by child-staff ratio at 24 months and caregiver training and education at 36 months of age. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes were better when children attended classes that met recommended child-staff ratios and recommended levels of caregiver training and education.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Kim and K. E. Peterson Association of Infant Child Care With Infant Feeding Practices and Weight Gain Among US Infants Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, July 1, 2008; 162(7): 627 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Bradley and D. L. Vandell Child Care and the Well-being of Children Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, July 1, 2007; 161(7): 669 - 676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Brennan Babies, Budgets, and Birthrates: Work/Family Policy in Australia 1996-2006 Soc. Pol., April 5, 2007; (2007) jxm003v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. I. Layzer and B. D. Goodson The "quality " of early care and education settings: definitional and measurement issues. Eval Rev, October 1, 2006; 30(5): 556 - 576. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zaslow, T. Halle, L. Martin, N. Cabrera, J. Calkins, L. Pitzer, and N. G. Margie Child outcome measures in the study of child care quality. Eval Rev, October 1, 2006; 30(5): 577 - 610. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Press, J. Fagan, and E. Bernd Child Care, Work, and Depressive Symptoms Among Low-Income Mothers Journal of Family Issues, May 1, 2006; 27(5): 609 - 632. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. N. Hickman Who Should Care for Our Children?: The Effects of Home Versus Center Care on Child Cognition and Social Adjustment Journal of Family Issues, May 1, 2006; 27(5): 652 - 684. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Committee on Early Childhood, Adoption, and Depend Quality Early Education and Child Care From Birth to Kindergarten Pediatrics, January 1, 2005; 115(1): 187 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Dearing, B. A. Taylor, and K. McCartney Implications of Family Income Dynamics for Women's Depressive Symptoms During the First 3 Years After Childbirth Am J Public Health, August 1, 2004; 94(8): 1372 - 1377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Rafferty, C. Boettcher, and K. W. Griffin Benefits and Risks of Reverse Inclusion for Preschoolers With and Without Disabilities: Parents' Perspectives Journal of Early Intervention, October 1, 2001; 24(4): 266 - 286. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. O'Keefe Consulting to child care centers an extension of daily work AAP News, April 19, 2001; 18(1): 23 - 23. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Melhuish The quest for quality in early day care and preschool experience continues International Journal of Behavioral Development, January 1, 2001; 25(1): 1 - 6. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |