HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Phillips, V L Articles by Sullivan, T J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Phillips, V L Articles by Sullivan, T J

Health care worker disability due to latex allergy and asthma: a cost analysis.

V L Phillips, M A Goodrich and T J Sullivan

Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University, Atlanta, Ga. 30322, USA. vphil01@sph.emory.edu

OBJECTIVES: The reported prevalence of occupational allergy to natural rubber latex is 8% to 17%, and that of latex-induced occupational asthma is 2.5% to 6%. Conversion of medical facilities to "latex-safe" can reduce employee sensitization, impairment, and disability. The purpose of this study was to determine the cost of a latex-safe approach, compared with that of continued latex glove use, and to identify the level of worker disability required to make the latex-safe approach financially preferable to a health care institution. METHODS: The costs of 2 strategies--latex-safe vs the status quo--were calculated from the perspective of 3 health care institutions. A break-even point was calculated for each facility. RESULTS: In all facilities, the cost of using nonlatex gloves exceeded the cost of using latex gloves. In all 3 facilities, however, 1% or fewer of those at risk would have to become fully disabled or fewer than 2% would have to become partially disabled for the continued use of latex gloves to exceed the cost of the latex-safe approach. CONCLUSION: Health care facilities, regardless of size, are likely to benefit financially from becoming latex-safe even if latex-related disability levels are extremely low.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. L. Hepner and M. C. Castells Latex Allergy: An Update Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2003; 96(4): 1219 - 1229. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Brehler and B. Kutting Natural Rubber Latex Allergy: A Problem of Interdisciplinary Concern in Medicine Arch Intern Med, April 23, 2001; 161(8): 1057 - 1064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]