HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Braveman, P Articles by Marchi, K Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Braveman, P Articles by Marchi, K

The prevalence of low income among childbearing women in California: implications for the private and public sectors.

P Braveman, S Egerter and K Marchi

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143, USA. pbrave@itsa.ucsf.edu

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the income distribution of childbearing women in California and sought to identify income groups at increased risk of untimely prenatal care. METHODS: A 1994/95 cross-sectional statewide survey of 10,132 postpartum women was used. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of all childbearing women had low income (0%-200% of the federal poverty level), and 46% were poor (0%-100% of the federal poverty level). Thirty-five percent of women with private prenatal coverage had low income. Most low-income women with Medi-Cal (California's Medicaid) or private coverage received their prenatal care at private-sector sites. Compared with women with incomes over 400% of the poverty level, both poor and near-poor women were at significantly elevated risk of untimely care after adjustment for insurance, education, age, parity, marital status, and ethnicity (adjusted odds ratios = 5.32 and 3.09, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study's results indicate that low-income women are the mainstream maternity population, not a "special needs" subgroup; even among privately insured childbearing women, a substantial proportion have low income. Efforts to increase timely prenatal care initiation cannot focus solely on women with Medicaid, the uninsured, women in absolute poverty, or those who receive care at public-sector sites.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. A. Braveman, S. A. Egerter, C. Cubbin, and K. S. Marchi An Approach to Studying Social Disparities in Health and Health Care Am J Public Health, December 1, 2004; 94(12): 2139 - 2148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Kahn, B. Zuckerman, H. Bauchner, C. J. Homer, and P. H. Wise Women's Health After Pregnancy and Child Outcomes at Age 3 Years: A Prospective Cohort Study Am J Public Health, August 1, 2002; 92(8): 1312 - 1318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Egerter, P. Braveman, and K. Marchi Timing of Insurance Coverage and Use of Prenatal Care Among Low-Income Women Am J Public Health, March 1, 2002; 92(3): 423 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Pearl, P. Braveman, and B. Abrams The Relationship of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Characteristics to Birthweight Among 5 Ethnic Groups in California Am J Public Health, November 1, 2001; 91(11): 1808 - 1814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. BRAVEMAN, K. MARCHI, S. EGERTER, M. PEARL, and J. NEUHAUS Barriers to Timely Prenatal Care Among Women With Insurance: The Importance of Prepregnancy Factors Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2000; 95(6): 874 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]