|
|
||||||||
Centre for Quality of Care Research, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands. m.hulscher@hsv.kun.nl
OBJECTIVES: This review was conducted to determine the effectiveness of different interventions to improve the delivery of preventive services in primary care. METHODS: MEDLINE searches and manual searches of 21 scientific journals and the Cochrane Effective Professional and Organization of Care of trials were used to identify relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials and controlled before-and-after studies were included if they focused on interventions designed to improve preventive activities by primary care clinicians. Two researchers independently assessed the quality of the studies and extracted data for use in constructing descriptive overviews. RESULTS: The 58 studies included comprised 86 comparisons between intervention and control groups. Postintervention differences between intervention and control groups varied widely within and across categories of interventions. Most interventions were found to be effective in some studies, but not effective in other studies. CONCLUSIONS: Effective interventions to increase preventive activities in primary care are available. Detailed studies are needed to identify factors that influence the effectiveness of different interventions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. W. Mold, C. A. Aspy, and Z. Nagykaldi Implementation of Evidence-Based Preventive Services Delivery Processes in Primary Care: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study J Am Board Fam Med, July 1, 2008; 21(4): 334 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Dexheimer, T. R. Talbot, D. L. Sanders, S. T. Rosenbloom, and D. Aronsky Prompting Clinicians about Preventive Care Measures: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2008; 15(3): 311 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Meriwether, F. Lobelo, and R. R. Pate Themed Review: Clinical Interventions to Promote Physical Activity in Youth American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, February 1, 2008; 2(1): 7 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Zolotor, G. D. Randolph, J. K. Johnson, S. Wegner, L. Edwards, C. Powell, and M. H. Esporas Effectiveness of a Practice-Based, Multimodal Quality Improvement Intervention for Gastroenteritis Within a Medicaid Managed Care Network Pediatrics, September 1, 2007; 120(3): e644 - e650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Roetzheim, L. K. Christman, P. B. Jacobsen, A. B. Cantor, J. Schroeder, R. Abdulla, S. Hunter, T. N. Chirikos, and J. P. Krischer A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Cancer Screening Among Attendees of Community Health Centers Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2004; 2(4): 294 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A Margolis, C. M Lannon, J. M Stuart, B. J Fried, L. Keyes-Elstein, and D. E Moore Jr Practice based education to improve delivery systems for prevention in primary care: randomised trial BMJ, February 14, 2004; 328(7436): 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Shakeshaft and C. J. Frankish Using patient-driven computers to provide cost-effective prevention in primary care: a conceptual framework Health Promot. Int., March 1, 2003; 18(1): 67 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. G. Stone, S. C. Morton, M. E. Hulscher, M. A. Maglione, E. A. Roth, J. M. Grimshaw, B. S. Mittman, L. V. Rubenstein, L. Z. Rubenstein, and P. G. Shekelle Interventions That Increase Use of Adult Immunization and Cancer Screening Services: A Meta-Analysis Ann Intern Med, May 7, 2002; 136(9): 641 - 651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lemelin, W. Hogg, and N. Baskerville Evidence to action: a tailored multifaceted approach to changing family physician practice patterns and improving preventive care Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 1, 2001; 164(6): 757 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |