AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 89, Issue 2 193-198, Copyright © 1999 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, B
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, B
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, L
Measurement of the validity of a preschool vision screening program.

B Robinson, W R Bobier, E Martin and L Bryant

School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

OBJECTIVES: The validity (sensitivity and specificity) of a preschool vision screening program was measured over a 3-year period to determine how well strabismus and significant refractive errors could be detected. METHODS: Public health nurses were trained to administer tests of visual acuity, stereoacuity, and ocular alignment. Failure on any test, visual acuity of 6/9 or less, stereoacuity of less than 100 seconds of arc, or an apparent misalignment of the eyes resulted in referral to an eye care practitioner. An age-matched control was also referred. Analysis of practitioner reports used predefined study-based criteria for ocular abnormalities. RESULTS: More than 1100 children were screened each year. The annually calculated prevalence of vision problems ranged between 10.5% and 13.8%. The estimated sensitivity varied from 60.4% to 70.9% (specificity, 69.6% to 79.9%). The yield indicated that a very high percentage of children with vision problems were identified for the first time. CONCLUSIONS: The validity of this screening is comparable to that of other school screenings. The limitations are predictable. Consideration should be given to replacing visual acuity tests with a rapid, objective measure of refractive error and ocular alignment.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 IOVSHome page
The Vision in Preschoolers Study Group
Does Assessing Eye Alignment along with Refractive Error or Visual Acuity Increase Sensitivity for Detection of Strabismus in Preschool Vision Screening?
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 3115 - 3125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann Fam MedHome page
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Screening for Visual Impairment in Children Younger Than Age 5 Years: Recommendation Statement
Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2004; 2(3): 263 - 266.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
L. Cowen and W. R. Bobier
The Pattern of Astigmatism in a Canadian Preschool Population
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2003; 44(10): 4593 - 4600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
S. Anker, J. Atkinson, O. Braddick, D. Ehrlich, T. Hartley, M. Nardini, and J. Wade
Identification of Infants with Significant Refractive Error and Strabismus in a Population Screening Program using Noncycloplegic Videorefraction and Orthoptic Examination
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2003; 44(2): 497 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
Other Articles Noted
Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 1999; 2(4): 105 - 112.
[Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Public Health Association