AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 89, Issue 11 1754-1756, Copyright © 1999 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnett, S
Right arrow Articles by Franks, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barnett, S
Right arrow Articles by Franks, P
Telephone ownership and deaf people: implications for telephone surveys.

S Barnett and P Franks

Primary Care Institute, Highland Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA. steven_barnett@URMC.rochester.edu

OBJECTIVES: This study was done to determine the prevalence of telephone ownership in different deaf populations and to explore its implications for telephone-based surveys. METHODS: Multivariate analyses, with adjustments for sociodemographics and health status, were done of National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data from 1990 and 1991, the years in which the NHIS Hearing Supplement was administered. RESULTS: Prelingually deafened adults were less likely than members of the general population to own a telephone (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.15, 0.82), whereas postlingually deafened adults were as likely as members of the general population to own one (AOR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.78, 1.28). CONCLUSIONS: Telephone surveys risk marginalizing prelingually deafened adults because of low telephone ownership and language barriers between the deaf and hearing communities.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
D. J. Lee, O. Gomez-Marin, B. L. Lam, and D. D. Zheng
Trends in Hearing Impairment in United States Adults: The National Health Interview Survey, 1986-1995
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2004; 59(11): 1186 - 1190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Public Health Association