HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Browner, C H Articles by Cox, S J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Browner, C H Articles by Cox, S J

Ethnicity, bioethics, and prenatal diagnosis: the amniocentesis decisions of Mexican-origin women and their partners.

C H Browner, H M Preloran and S J Cox

Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles 90024-1759, USA. browner@ucla.edu

Bioethical standards and counseling techniques that regulate prenatal diagnosis in the United States were developed at a time when the principal constituency for fetal testing was a self-selected group of White, well-informed, middle-class women. The routine use of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) testing, which has become widespread since the mid-1980s, introduced new constituencies to prenatal diagnosis. These new constituencies include ethnic minority women, who, with the exception of women from certain Asian groups, refuse amniocentesis at significantly higher rates than others. This study examines the considerations taken into account by a group of Mexican-origin women who had screened positive for AFP and were deciding whether to undergo amniocentesis. We reviewed 379 charts and interviewed 147 women and 120 partners to test a number of factors that might explain why some women accept amniocentesis and some refuse. A woman's attitudes toward doctors, medicine, and prenatal care and her assessment of the risk and uncertainty associated with the procedure were found to be most significant. Case summaries demonstrate the indeterminacy of the decision-making process. We concluded that established bioethical principles and counseling techniques need to be more sensitive to the way ethnic minority clients make their amniocentesis choices.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. F. Haward, R. O. Murphy, and J. M. Lorenz Message Framing and Perinatal Decisions Pediatrics, July 1, 2008; 122(1): 109 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. M. Preloran, C. H. Browner, and E. Lieber Impact of Interpreters' Approach on Latinas' Use of Amniocentesis Health Educ Behav, October 1, 2005; 32(5): 599 - 612. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. H. Browner and H. M. Preloran Expectations, Emotions, and Medical Decision Making: A Case Study on the Use of Amniocentesis Transcultural Psychiatry, December 1, 2004; 41(4): 427 - 444. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. M. Preloran, C. H. Browner, and E. Lieber Strategies for Motivating Latino Couples' Participation in Qualitative Health Research and Their Effects on Sample Construction Am J Public Health, November 1, 2001; 91(11): 1832 - 1841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. H. Browner and H. M. Preloran Interpreting Low-Income Latinas' Amniocentesis Refusals Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, August 1, 2000; 22(3): 346 - 368. [Abstract] [PDF]