HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Asch, A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Asch, A

Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: a challenge to practice and policy.

A Asch

Program in Biology, Ethics, and the Politics of Human Production, Wellesley College, MA 02481-8201, USA. aasch@wellesley.edu

Professionals should reexamine negative assumptions about the quality of life with prenatally detectable impairments and should reform clinical practice and public policy to improve informed decision making and genuine reproductive choice. Current data on children and families affected by disabilities indicate that disability does not preclude a satisfying life. Many problems attributed to the existence of a disability actually stem from inadequate social arrangements that public health professionals should work to change. This article assumes a pro-choice perspective but suggests that unreflective uses of prenatal testing could diminish, rather than expand, women's choices. This critique challenges the view of disability that lies behind the social endorsement of such testing and the conviction that women will or should end their pregnancies if they discover that the fetus has a disabling trait.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. G. K. Atkins The Choice of Two Mothers: Disability, Gender, Sexuality, and Prenatal Testing Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies, February 1, 2008; 8(1): 106 - 129. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Khoshnood, C. De Vigan, V. Vodovar, G. Breart, F. Goffinet, and B. Blondel Advances in Medical Technology and Creation of Disparities: The Case of Down Syndrome Am J Public Health, December 1, 2006; 96(12): 2139 - 2144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Gollust, K. Apse, B. P. Fuller, P. S. Miller, and B. B. Biesecker Community Involvement in Developing Policies for Genetic Testing: Assessing the Interests and Experiences of Individuals Affected by Genetic Conditions Am J Public Health, January 1, 2005; 95(1): 35 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Khoshnood, B. Blondel, C. De Vigan, and G. Breart Socioeconomic Barriers to Informed Decisionmaking Regarding Maternal Serum Screening for Down Syndrome: Results of the French National Perinatal Survey of 1998 Am J Public Health, March 1, 2004; 94(3): 484 - 491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Alderson, C. Williams, and B. Farsides Practitioners' Views about Equity within Prenatal Services Sociology, February 1, 2004; 38(1): 61 - 80. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. M. Modell and T. Citrin Ethics Instruction in an Issues-Oriented Course on Public Health Genetics Health Educ Behav, February 1, 2002; 29(1): 43 - 60. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Alderson Prenatal Screening, Ethics and Down's Syndrome: a literature review Nursing Ethics, July 1, 2001; 8(4): 360 - 374. [Abstract] [PDF]