|
|
||||||||
Mental Health Services Research Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53792, USA.
When silicone gel breast implants became the subject of a public health controversy in the early 1990s, the most pressing concern was safety. This paper looks at another, less publicized issue: the need for implants. Using a symbolic interactionist approach, the author explores the social construction of the need for implants by tracing the history of the 3 surgical procedures for which implants were used. Stakeholders in this history constructed need as legitimized individual desire, the form of which shifted with changes in the technological and social context.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Eisinger Prophylactic mastectomy: ethical issues Br. Med. Bull., April 4, 2007; (2007) ldm003v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S O Hansson Implant ethics J. Med. Ethics, September 1, 2005; 31(9): 519 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |