AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 88, Issue 8 1186-1192, Copyright © 1998 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Selvin, S
Right arrow Articles by Ragland, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Selvin, S
Right arrow Articles by Ragland, K
Breast cancer detection: maps of 2 San Francisco Bay area counties.

S Selvin, D W Merrill, C Erdmann, M White and K Ragland

Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley 94720-7360, USA.

OBJECTIVES: This study describes the incidence of late-stage and in situ breast cancer among White women, using specialized mapping techniques that reflect incidence adjusted for the population at risk, and applies these maps to characterize areas with high and low risk of breast cancer. METHODS: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and the US Census Bureau were used to study the geographic distribution of breast cancer at the census-tract level in 2 San Francisco Bay Area counties for the years 1978 through 1982. Sociodemographic characteristics of areas with high and low incidence of the stage-specific disease were compared by means of a linear discriminant function. RESULTS: For late-stage breast cancer, the most important variables in discriminating high-risk from low-risk areas were college education, percentage of residents over age 65, and median income. The strongest ecologic indicators of high risk for in situ breast cancer were median income and percentage unemployed. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the usefulness of census tracts and sociodemographic measures of income and education in describing in situ and late-stage breast cancer.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. A. MacKinnon, R. C. Duncan, Y. Huang, D. J. Lee, L. E. Fleming, L. Voti, M. Rudolph, and J. D. Wilkinson
Detecting an Association between Socioeconomic Status and Late Stage Breast Cancer Using Spatial Analysis and Area-Based Measures
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2007; 16(4): 756 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Public Health Association