AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 88, Issue 6 876-879, Copyright © 1998 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJPH
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Colfax, G N
Right arrow Articles by Bindman, A B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Colfax, G N
Right arrow Articles by Bindman, A B
Health benefits and risks of reporting HIV-infected individuals by name.

G N Colfax and A B Bindman

San Francisco Department of Public Health, AIDS Office, CA 94102-6033, USA. grantvcolfax@dph.sf.ca.us

With more treatment options emerging for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, the policy of reporting HIV-infected individuals by name merits reevaluation. This paper reviews the benefits and risks of name reporting of persons infected with HIV. Public health departments have linked name reporting with medical referrals, risk reduction counseling, and partner notification programs. Yet some studies indicate that people are less likely to be tested for HIV infection when name reporting is implemented. Whether name reporting actually improves individual or public health, therefore justifying the increased risk of loss of confidentiality and possibly reduced testing rates, remains unknown. The lack of health outcome data on name reporting allows beliefs rather than facts to dominate debate about this policy. Before this practice is more widely adopted, a determination should be made as to whether the potential benefits of name reporting outweigh the risks.


Related articles in AJPH:

Name-based reporting of HIV infection.
P M Wortley, J S Lehman, and P L Fleming
AJPH 1999 89: 1271-1273. [PDF]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. H. Osmond, A. B. Bindman, K. Vranizan, J. S. Lehman, F. M. Hecht, D. Keane, A. Reingold, and for the Multistate Evaluation of Surveillance for
Name-Based Surveillance and Public Health Interventions for Persons with HIV Infection
Ann Intern Med, November 16, 1999; 131(10): 775 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Public Health Association