HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Michael, R T Articles by Wellings, K Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Michael, R T Articles by Wellings, K

Private sexual behavior, public opinion, and public health policy related to sexually transmitted diseases: a US-British comparison.

R T Michael, J Wadsworth, J Feinleib, A M Johnson, E O Laumann and K Wellings

Harris School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize sexual behavior and opinions about sex in the United States and Britain; implications are discussed for effective public health policy regarding sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in the United States. METHODS: Large-scale national probability surveys conducted in the 2 countries detailed sexual behavior, opinions, and the prevalence of STDs. RESULTS: In comparison with that of Britain, the US population has greater variability in sexual behavior, less tolerant opinions about sexual behavior, and a higher STD prevalence and lower condom usage among men. CONCLUSIONS: The survey data show compelling evidence from both countries of a strong association between number of sex partners and STD risk. In the United States relative to Britain, there is both greater dispersion in sexual behavior and a greater incidence of unconditional opposition to certain sexual practices. The former implies a need for strong public health policy to address the risks of STDs, but the latter implies strong opposition to that policy. This disjuncture between public health need and feasibility may contribute to the high US rate of STDs.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Artz, M. Macaluso, J. Kelaghan, H. Austin, M. Fleenor, L. Robey, E. W. Hook III, and I. Brill An Intervention to Promote the Female Condom to Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic Patients Behav Modif, March 1, 2005; 29(2): 318 - 369. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. D. Sanders, A. M. Bayoumi, V. Sundaram, S. P. Bilir, C. P. Neukermans, C. E. Rydzak, L. R. Douglass, L. C. Lazzeroni, M. Holodniy, and D. K. Owens Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for HIV in the Era of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy N. Engl. J. Med., February 10, 2005; 352(6): 570 - 585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. W. Chesson, S. D. Pinkerton, R. Voigt, and G. W. Counts HIV Infections and Associated Costs Attributable to Syphilis Coinfection Among African Americans Am J Public Health, June 1, 2003; 93(6): 943 - 948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A M Johnson, K A Fenton, and C Mercer Phase specific strategies for the prevention, control, and elimination of sexually transmitted diseases: background country profile, England and Wales Sex Transm Inf, April 1, 2002; 78(90001): i125 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Georgala, K. Schulpis, C. Georgala, and G. Karikas Gonorrhoea control programme in Athens, 1974-98 Sex Transm Inf, December 1, 2001; 77(6): 458 - 459. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Laumann and R. Newson Appropriate Controls Are Essential in Assessing the Relationship Between Circumcision and Penile Dermatoses Arch Dermatol, April 1, 2001; 137(4): 503 - 504. [Full Text] [PDF]