AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 88, Issue 4 667-671, Copyright © 1998 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fintor, L
Right arrow Articles by Houn, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fintor, L
Right arrow Articles by Houn, F
The impact of mammography quality improvement legislation in Michigan: implications for the National Mammography Quality Standards Act.

L Fintor, M Brown, R Fischer, O Suleiman, C Garlinghouse, J Camburn, E Frazier and F Houn

Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md, USA.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the impact of state legislation on mammography quality and access in Michigan. METHODS: The impact of state legislation was analyzed with respect to utilization, numbers of machines and facilities, and image quality. RESULTS: The legislation had a positive effect on image quality improvement, had no impact on utilization by women aged 50 years and above, and resulted in few facility closures. CONCLUSIONS: Michigan's legislative intervention appears to have had a positive effect on efforts to improve mammography quality assurance with implications for other federal and state efforts to achieve quality assurance in health care delivery.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. H. Taplin, C. M. Rutter, and C. D. Lehman
Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1475 - 1482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. H. Taplin, C. M. Rutter, C. Finder, M. T. Mandelson, F. Houn, and E. White
Screening Mammography: Clinical Image Quality and the Risk of Interval Breast Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 797 - 803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. H. Taplin, C. M. Rutter, J. G. Elmore, D. Seger, D. White, and R. J. Brenner
Accuracy of Screening Mammography Using Single Versus Independent Double Interpretation
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1257 - 1262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Public Health Association